» Articles » PMID: 27286812

Implementation Interventions to Improve the Management of Non-specific Low Back Pain: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Orthopedics
Physiology
Date 2016 Jun 12
PMID 27286812
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recommendations in clinical practice guidelines for non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) are not necessarily translated into practice. Multiple studies have investigated different interventions to implement best evidence into clinical practice yet no synthesis of these studies has been carried out to date. The aim of this study was to systematically review available studies to determine whether implementation interventions in this field have been effective and to identify which strategies have been most successful in changing healthcare practitioner behaviours and improving patient outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review was undertaken, searching electronic databases until end of December 2012 plus hand searching, writing to key authors and using prior knowledge of the field to identify papers. Included studies evaluated an implementation intervention to improve the management of NSLBP in clinical practice, measured key outcomes regarding change in practitioner behaviour and/or patient outcomes and subjected their data to statistical analysis. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) recommendations about systematic review conduct were followed. Study inclusion, data extraction and study risk of bias assessments were conducted independently by two review authors.

Results: Of 7654 potentially eligible citations, 17 papers reporting on 14 studies were included. Risk of bias of included studies was highly variable with 7 of 17 papers rated at high risk. Single intervention or one-off implementation efforts were consistently ineffective in changing clinical practice. Increasing the frequency and duration of implementation interventions led to greater success with those continuously ongoing over time the most successful in improving clinical practice in line with best evidence recommendations.

Conclusions: Single intervention or one-off implementation interventions may seem attractive but are largely unsuccessful in effecting meaningful change in clinical practice for NSLBP. Increasing frequency and duration of implementation interventions seems to lead to greater success and the most successful implementation interventions used consistently sustained strategies.

Citing Articles

Assessing the readiness and feasibility to implement a model of care for spine disorders and related disability in Cross Lake, an Indigenous community in northern Manitoba, Canada: a research protocol.

Bussieres A, Passmore S, Kopansky-Giles D, Tavares P, Ward J, Ladwig J Chiropr Man Therap. 2025; 33(1):12.

PMID: 40082975 PMC: 11908001. DOI: 10.1186/s12998-025-00576-1.


The MyGuide Web-Based Self-Management Tool for Concussion Rehabilitation: Mixed Methods Cross-Sectional Study.

Turcott A, Kang R, Yao C, OMelinn C, Mahoney P, Barlow S JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025; 12():e59181.

PMID: 39773679 PMC: 11751642. DOI: 10.2196/59181.


Sustainable implementation efforts in physio- and occupational therapy: a scoping review.

Fritz J, Stridsberg S, Holopainen R Implement Sci Commun. 2024; 5(1):138.

PMID: 39668369 PMC: 11636039. DOI: 10.1186/s43058-024-00676-8.


Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Zhao S, Langford A, Chen Q, Lyu M, Yang Z, French S EClinicalMedicine. 2024; 78:102916.

PMID: 39606686 PMC: 11600785. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102916.


The Alberta Back Care Pathway: The feasibility of implementing a novel care pathway to improve low back pain management for family physicians in primary care.

Powelske B, Kongsted A, Jones A, Kawchuk G PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0312737.

PMID: 39602423 PMC: 11602090. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312737.


References
1.
Williams C, Maher C, Hancock M, McAuley J, McLachlan A, Britt H . Low back pain and best practice care: A survey of general practice physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(3):271-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.507. View

2.
Koes B, van Tulder M, Ostelo R, Burton A, Waddell G . Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 26(22):2504-13; discussion 2513-4. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200111150-00022. View

3.
Kerry S, Oakeshott P, Dundas D, Williams J . Influence of postal distribution of the Royal College of Radiologists' guidelines, together with feedback on radiological referral rates, on X-ray referrals from general practice: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2000; 17(1):46-52. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/17.1.46. View

4.
Pablos-Mendez A, Shademani R . Knowledge translation in global health. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006; 26(1):81-6. DOI: 10.1002/chp.54. View

5.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D . Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. Open Med. 2011; 3(3):e123-30. PMC: 3090117. View