» Articles » PMID: 27284299

Clinical Effect of Ticagrelor Administered in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Overview
Journal Exp Ther Med
Specialty Pathology
Date 2016 Jun 11
PMID 27284299
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze the clinical effect and safety of ticagrelor administration in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In total, 203 patients were enrolled, who were confirmed with ACS between March 2013 and May 2013, and had successfully undergone PCI. The patients were randomly divided into two groups, including the clopidogrel (group A, n=108) and ticagrelor groups (group B, n=95). Patients in group A were treated with a 600 mg loading dose of clopidogrel followed by 75 mg/day clopidogrel plus 100 mg/day aspirin. Patients in group B received a 180 mg loading dose of ticagrelor followed by 90 mg ticagrelor twice daily plus 100 mg/day aspirin. Light transmission aggregometry was performed to measure the platelet aggregation rate prior to and following 4 weeks of anti-platelet drug treatment. In addition, the rate of cardiovascular events and the adverse drug reactions were recorded within a 1-year treatment period. Compared with the clopidogrel group, the rate of recurrent angina in the ticagrelor group was significantly lower (P=0.05). However, the rate of dyspnea in the ticagrelor group was significantly higher when compared with that in the clopidogrel group (P=0.03). After 4 weeks of treatment, the reduction in the platelet aggregation rate was significantly different between the two groups (P<0.05). Therefore, ticagrelor, which is a novel antiplatelet aggregation drug, may reduce the rate of the adverse cardiovascular events in ACS patients following PCI, but a higher incidence of side-effects, such as dyspnea, may be observed.

Citing Articles

The risk of dyspnea in patients treated with third-generation P2Y inhibitors compared with clopidogrel: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Zhang N, Xu W, Li O, Zhang B BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020; 20(1):140.

PMID: 32183711 PMC: 7079377. DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01419-y.


Therapeutic experience of ticagrelor in Indian patients with acute coronary syndrome: A non-interventional, prospective, and observational study.

Sawhney J, Dalal J, Mullasari A, Bansal S, Kahali D Indian Heart J. 2019; 71(4):344-349.

PMID: 31779864 PMC: 6890951. DOI: 10.1016/j.ihj.2019.08.001.


Evaluation of related factors, prediction and treatment drugs of no-reflow phenomenon in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction after direct PCI.

Li H, Fu D, Liu F, Zhou H, Li X Exp Ther Med. 2018; 15(4):3940-3946.

PMID: 29563988 PMC: 5858114. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.5900.

References
1.
Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, Bosch J, Davies R, Dagenais G . Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000; 342(3):145-53. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM200001203420301. View

2.
Lyon R, Morris A, Caesar D, Gray S, Gray A . Chest pain presenting to the Emergency Department--to stratify risk with GRACE or TIMI?. Resuscitation. 2007; 74(1):90-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.11.023. View

3.
Sofi F, Marcucci R, Gori A, Giusti B, Abbate R, Gensini G . Clopidogrel non-responsiveness and risk of cardiovascular morbidity. An updated meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost. 2010; 103(4):841-8. DOI: 10.1160/TH09-06-0418. View

4.
James S, Roe M, Cannon C, Cornel J, Horrow J, Husted S . Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes intended for non-invasive management: substudy from prospective randomised PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. BMJ. 2011; 342:d3527. PMC: 3117310. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d3527. View

5.
Kontos M, Diercks D, Ho P, Wang T, Chen A, Roe M . Treatment and outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction treated with acute β-blocker therapy: results from the American College of Cardiology's NCDR(®). Am Heart J. 2011; 161(5):864-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2011.01.006. View