A Modified Random Walk Door-to-door Recruitment Strategy for Collecting Social and Biological Data Relating to Mental Health, Substance Use, Addiction, and Violence Problems in a Canadian Community

Overview

Journal Int J Alcohol Drug Res

Specialty Psychiatry

Date 2016 Jun 10

PMID 27279929

Citations 14

Authors

Andrea Flynn

Paul F Tremblay

Jurgen Rehm

Samantha Wells

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Aims: To describe a modified "random walk" door-to-door recruitment strategy used to obtain a random community sample for participation in a study relating to mental health, substance use, addiction, and violence (MSAV) problems and involving the collection of both self-report and biological (hair and saliva) data. This paper describes study protocols, response rates for the study and for the provision of biological data, and possible further applications for this data collection method.

Design: A two-stage cluster sample was derived from the 2006 Canadian census sampling frame for a small Ontario community, based on the random selection of city blocks as the primary sampling units and households as the secondary sampling units.

Setting: A small city in Ontario, Canada.

Participants: A general population sample of 92 participants selected randomly from households using Kish tables.

Measures: A computerized questionnaire was administered to obtain self-report data on MSAV problems. Saliva was collected to study genetic vulnerabilities to MSAV problems, and hair was collected to examine stress levels (via the hormone cortisol) as they relate to MSAV problems.

Findings: The study showed a response rate of 50% and a high rate of provision of biological samples (over 95%).

Conclusions: Modified random walk methodologies involving face-to-face recruitment may represent a useful approach for obtaining general population samples for studies of MSAV problems, particularly those involving the collection of biological samples. Further studies are needed to assess whether this approach leads to better response rates and improved estimates compared to other survey methods used in research on substance use.

Citing Articles

Mental health care-seeking and barriers: a cross-sectional study of an urban Latinx community.

Newberry J, A Gimenez M, Gunturkun F, Villa E, Maldonado M, Gonzalez D BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):3091.

PMID: 39516848 PMC: 11545330. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-20533-6.

I belong, therefore I am: The role of economic culture in compliance with COVID-19 preventive measures.

Li H Int J Intercult Relat. 2024; :101856.

PMID: 38620216 PMC: 10308229. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2023.101856.

Knowledge, awareness, and use of folic acid among women of childbearing age living in a peri-urban community in Ghana: a cross-sectional survey.

Akwaa Harrison O, Ifie I, Nkwonta C, Dzandu B, Gattor A, Adimado E BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):241.

PMID: 38580949 PMC: 10996122. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06408-z.

Measuring loneliness: Psychometric properties of the three-item loneliness scale among community-dwelling adults.

Daniel F, Espirito-Santo H, Lemos L, Guadalupe S, Barroso I, Gomes da Silva A Heliyon. 2023; 9(5):e15948.

PMID: 37215896 PMC: 10192737. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15948.

Menstrual characteristics and dysmenorrhea among Palestinian adolescent refugee camp dwellers in the West Bank and Jordan: a cross-sectional study.

Ghandour R, Hammoudeh W, Stigum H, Giacaman R, Fjeld H, Holmboe-Ottesen G Arch Public Health. 2023; 81(1):47.

PMID: 36998019 PMC: 10061948. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-023-01059-6.

References

Jatlow P, OMalley S . Clinical (nonforensic) application of ethyl glucuronide measurement: are we ready?. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010; 34(6):968-75. PMC: 3711108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01171.x. View

Muller D, Likhodi O, Heinz A . Neural markers of genetic vulnerability to drug addiction. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010; 3:277-99. DOI: 10.1007/7854_2009_25. View

Jaszczak A, Lundeen K, Smith S . Using Nonmedically Trained Interviewers to Collect Biomeasures in a National In-Home Survey. Field methods. 2011; 21(1):26-48. PMC: 3143069. DOI: 10.1177/1525822X08323988. View

Hartge P . Raising response rates: getting to yes. Epidemiology. 1999; 10(2):105-7. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199903000-00003. View

Delaney-Black V, Chiodo L, Hannigan J, Greenwald M, Janisse J, Patterson G . Just say "I don't": lack of concordance between teen report and biological measures of drug use. Pediatrics. 2010; 126(5):887-93. PMC: 3508771. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2009-3059. View

Tolonen H, Helakorpi S, Talala K, Helasoja V, Martelin T, Prattala R . 25-year trends and socio-demographic differences in response rates: Finnish adult health behaviour survey. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006; 21(6):409-15. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9019-8. View

Mundt A, Aichberger M, Kliewe T, Ignatyev Y, Yayla S, Heimann H . Random sampling for a mental health survey in a deprived multi-ethnic area of Berlin. Community Ment Health J. 2012; 48(6):792-7. DOI: 10.1007/s10597-012-9483-4. View

Milligan P, Njie A, Bennett S . Comparison of two cluster sampling methods for health surveys in developing countries. Int J Epidemiol. 2004; 33(3):469-76. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyh096. View

Galway L, Bell N, Sae A, Hagopian A, Burnham G, Flaxman A . A two-stage cluster sampling method using gridded population data, a GIS, and Google Earth(TM) imagery in a population-based mortality survey in Iraq. Int J Health Geogr. 2012; 11:12. PMC: 3490933. DOI: 10.1186/1476-072X-11-12. View

10.

Freeman W, Vrana K . Future prospects for biomarkers of alcohol consumption and alcohol-induced disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010; 34(6):946-54. PMC: 2900387. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01169.x. View

11.

Hahn J, Dobkin L, Mayanja B, Emenyonu N, Kigozi I, Shiboski S . Phosphatidylethanol (PEth) as a biomarker of alcohol consumption in HIV-positive patients in sub-Saharan Africa. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011; 36(5):854-62. PMC: 3310261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01669.x. View

12.

Lemeshow S, Robinson D . Surveys to measure programme coverage and impact: a review of the methodology used by the expanded programme on immunization. World Health Stat Q. 1985; 38(1):65-75. View

13.

Bearer C, Bailey S, Hoek J . Advancing alcohol biomarkers research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010; 34(6):941-5. PMC: 4196261. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01168.x. View

14.

Bennett S, Woods T, Liyanage W, Smith D . A simplified general method for cluster-sample surveys of health in developing countries. World Health Stat Q. 1991; 44(3):98-106. View

15.

Wild T, Cunningham J, Adlaf E . Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers. J Stud Alcohol. 2001; 62(2):257-61. DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.257. View

16.

Hansen T, Simonsen M, Nielsen F, Hundrup Y . Collection of blood, saliva, and buccal cell samples in a pilot study on the Danish nurse cohort: comparison of the response rate and quality of genomic DNA. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(10):2072-6. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0611. View

17.

Kempf A, Remington P . New challenges for telephone survey research in the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Public Health. 2006; 28:113-26. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.28.021406.144059. View

18.

Cunradi C, Moore R, Killoran M, Ames G . Survey nonresponse bias among young adults: the role of alcohol, tobacco, and drugs. Subst Use Misuse. 2005; 40(2):171-85. DOI: 10.1081/ja-200048447. View

19.

Burg J, Allred S, Sapp 2nd J . The potential for bias due to attrition in the National Exposure Registry: an examination of reasons for nonresponse, nonrespondent characteristics, and the response rate. Toxicol Ind Health. 1997; 13(1):1-13. DOI: 10.1177/074823379701300101. View

20.

Litten R, Bradley A, Moss H . Alcohol biomarkers in applied settings: recent advances and future research opportunities. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2010; 34(6):955-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2010.01170.x. View