» Articles » PMID: 27279097

Association Between Primary Care Visits and Colorectal Cancer Screening Outcomes in the Era of Population Health Outreach

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 Jun 10
PMID 27279097
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Population outreach strategies are increasingly used to improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The influence of primary care on cancer screening in this context is unknown.

Objective: To assess associations between primary care provider (PCP) visits and receipt of CRC screening and colonoscopy after a positive fecal immunochemical (FIT) or fecal occult blood test (FOBT).

Design: Population-based cohort study.

Participants: A total of 968,072 patients ages 50-74 years who were not up to date with CRC screening in 2011 in four integrated healthcare systems (three with screening outreach programs using FIT kits) in the Population-Based Research Optimizing Screening through Personalized Regimens (PROSPR) consortium.

Measures: Demographic, clinical, PCP visit, and CRC screening data were obtained from electronic health records and administrative databases. We examined associations between PCP visits in 2011 and receipt of FIT/FOBT, screening colonoscopy, or flexible sigmoidoscopy (CRC screening) in 2012 and follow-up colonoscopy within 3 months of a positive FIT/FOBT in 2012. We used multivariable logistic regression and propensity score models to adjust for confounding.

Results: Fifty-eight percent of eligible patients completed a CRC screening test in 2012, most by FIT. Those with a greater number of PCP visits had higher rates of CRC screening at all sites. Patients with ≥1 PCP visit had nearly twice the adjusted-odds of CRC screening (OR = 1.88, 95 % CI: 1.86-1.89). Overall, 79.6 % of patients with a positive FIT/FOBT completed colonoscopy within 3 months. Patients with ≥1 PCP visit had 30 % higher adjusted odds of completing colonoscopy after positive FIT/FOBT (OR = 1.30; 95 % CI: 1.22-1.40).

Conclusions: Patients with a greater number of PCP visits had higher rates of both incident CRC screening and colonoscopy after positive FIT/FOBT, even in health systems with active population health outreach programs. In this era of virtual care and population outreach, primary care visits remain an important mechanism for engaging patients in cancer screening.

Citing Articles

Socioeconomic disparity in stage at cancer diagnosis among patients with type 2 diabetes in Dutch primary care: a cross-sectional study.

de Haan-Du J, Groenier K, Kleefstra N, van der Vegt B, Siesling S, Landman G BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000050.

PMID: 40018189 PMC: 11812784. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000050.


Effect of GP visits in the compliance of preventive services: a cross-sectional study in Europe.

Ares-Blanco S, Lopez-Rodriguez J, Polentinos-Castro E, Del Cura-Gonzalez I BMC Prim Care. 2024; 25(1):165.

PMID: 38750446 PMC: 11094967. DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02400-w.


Improving Colorectal Cancer Screening in a Regional Safety-Net Health System over a 10-Year Period: Lessons for Population Health.

Halm E, Nair R, Hu E, Wang L, Lykken J, Ortiz C J Gen Intern Med. 2023; 39(6):978-984.

PMID: 37932541 PMC: 11074086. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08477-w.


Availability of Primary Care Physicians and Racial Disparities in Colorectal Cancer-Related Mortality in the United States.

Grewal U, Aggarwal M, Gaddam S, Kumar P, Garikipati S, Fei N J Gastrointest Cancer. 2023; 55(1):171-174.

PMID: 37418113 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00956-x.


Patient preferences for the design of a pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.

Brenner A, Waters A, Wangen M, Rohweder C, Odebunmi O, Marciniak M Cancer Causes Control. 2023; 34(Suppl 1):99-112.

PMID: 37072526 PMC: 10113122. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01687-x.


References
1.
Beaber E, Kim J, Schapira M, Tosteson A, Zauber A, Geiger A . Unifying screening processes within the PROSPR consortium: a conceptual model for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015; 107(6):djv120. PMC: 4838064. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djv120. View

2.
Tiro J, Kamineni A, Levin T, Zheng Y, Schottinger J, Rutter C . The colorectal cancer screening process in community settings: a conceptual model for the population-based research optimizing screening through personalized regimens consortium. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014; 23(7):1147-58. PMC: 4148641. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1217. View

3.
Chubak J, Garcia M, Burnett-Hartman A, Zheng Y, Corley D, Halm E . Time to Colonoscopy after Positive Fecal Blood Test in Four U.S. Health Care Systems. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2016; 25(2):344-50. PMC: 4767632. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-15-0470. View

4.
Lee J, Jensen C, Lee A, Doubeni C, Zauber A, Levin T . Development and validation of an algorithm for classifying colonoscopy indication. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015; 81(3):575-582.e4. PMC: 4340717. DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.07.031. View

5.
Verma M, Sarfaty M, Brooks D, Wender R . Population-based programs for increasing colorectal cancer screening in the United States. CA Cancer J Clin. 2015; 65(6):497-510. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21295. View