» Articles » PMID: 27273092

Cognitive Deficits in First-degree Relatives of Bipolar Patients: the Use of Homogeneous Subgroups in the Search of Cognitive Endophenotypes

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2016 Jun 9
PMID 27273092
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated impairments in attention, memory and executive functions in euthymic bipolar patients (BP) as well as their unaffected first-degree relatives, albeit in an attenuated form. Subsequently, cognitive deficits are discussed as a possible endophenotype of bipolar disorder. However, recent studies showed that only a subgroup of BP shows cognitive impairments. The aim of the present study was to investigate cognitive functioning in relatives compared to BP, to find out if the differentiation in a cognitive deficit vs. non-deficit subgroup is valid for relatives of BP, too. Therefore, the performance of 27 unaffected relatives of BP, 27 euthymic BP and 27 HC were compared using a neuropsychological test battery. The results showed that BP exhibited a reduced psychomotor speed and deficits in working memory compared to relatives and HC. Relatives performed significantly slower (psychomotor speed) as compared to HC (p = 0.024); performance in the other test measures lie between BP and HC. Furthermore, a detailed evaluation of the data indicated that only subgroups of BP and relatives exhibited cognitive impairments in the implemented tests. However, the deficit and non-deficit groups did not differ in sociodemographic and clinical variables from each other, possibly due to the small sample size. In conclusion, our results suggest that reduced psychomotor speed could serve as a potential endophenotype for bipolar disorder which should be investigated along the developmental trajectory of this disorder, also to examine whether abnormalities therein precede onset of the first mood episode. Furthermore, the division of relatives into subgroups aids in the identification of stable trait markers and high-risk bipolar groups and could enable early prevention strategies. As to that more research using distinct and homogeneous subgroups is necessary.

Citing Articles

MICEmi: A method to identify cognitive endophenotypes of mental illnesses.

Correa-Ghisays P, Sanchez-Orti J, Balanza-Martinez V, Fuentes-Dura I, Martinez-Aran A, Ruiz-Bolo L Eur Psychiatry. 2022; 65(1):e85.

PMID: 36440538 PMC: 9807453. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2022.2348.


Emotional intelligence in bipolar-I-disorder: A comparison between patients, unaffected siblings, and control subjects.

Frajo-Apor B, Kemmler G, Pardeller S, Huber M, Macina C, Welte A Eur Psychiatry. 2020; 63(1):e69.

PMID: 32594936 PMC: 7443786. DOI: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.66.


Cross-Disorder Cognitive Impairments in Youth Referred for Neuropsychiatric Evaluation.

Doyle A, Vuijk P, Doty N, McGrath L, Willoughby B, ODonnell E J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017; 24(1):91-103.

PMID: 28774351 PMC: 5789455. DOI: 10.1017/S1355617717000601.


Potential biomarkers for bipolar disorder: Where do we stand?.

Sagar R, Pattanayak R Indian J Med Res. 2017; 145(1):7-16.

PMID: 28574009 PMC: 5460576. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_1386_16.


Neurocognitive performance as an endophenotype for mood disorder subgroups.

Merikangas A, Cui L, Calkins M, Moore T, Gur R, Gur R J Affect Disord. 2017; 215:163-171.

PMID: 28340442 PMC: 5441552. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.021.


References
1.
Glahn D, Bearden C, Niendam T, Escamilla M . The feasibility of neuropsychological endophenotypes in the search for genes associated with bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disord. 2004; 6(3):171-82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2004.00113.x. View

2.
Keri S, Kelemen O, Benedek G, Janka Z . Different trait markers for schizophrenia and bipolar disorder: a neurocognitive approach. Psychol Med. 2001; 31(5):915-22. DOI: 10.1017/s0033291701004068. View

3.
Kurtz M, Gerraty R . A meta-analytic investigation of neurocognitive deficits in bipolar illness: profile and effects of clinical state. Neuropsychology. 2009; 23(5):551-62. PMC: 2804472. DOI: 10.1037/a0016277. View

4.
Schulze K, Walshe M, Stahl D, Hall M, Kravariti E, Morris R . Executive functioning in familial bipolar I disorder patients and their unaffected relatives. Bipolar Disord. 2011; 13(2):208-16. DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2011.00901.x. View

5.
Vieta E, Reinares M, Rosa A . Staging bipolar disorder. Neurotox Res. 2010; 19(2):279-85. DOI: 10.1007/s12640-010-9197-8. View