» Articles » PMID: 2727075

Calorimetric Validation of the Caltrac Accelerometer During Level Walking

Overview
Journal Phys Ther
Date 1989 Jun 1
PMID 2727075
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to compare the Caltrac accelerometer output with measured energy expenditure (Ee). Twenty-five volunteers (10 men, 15 women) walked on a level motor-driven treadmill at four different speeds (54, 81, 104, and 130 m.min-1) with the Caltrac device affixed to the waistline. Each of the four experimental trials lasted eight minutes, and the testing was completed within an hour. During the test, oxygen consumption (VO2) (in L.min-1 and in mL.kg-1.min-1) and nonprotein respiratory exchange ratio were monitored by the Beckman Horizon metabolic cart. The accelerometer output at the end of each exercise bout was also monitored and subsequently divided by 8 to convert the readings to counts.min-1. The mean VO2 (L.min-1) at steady state (ie, 6th-8th minutes of exercise) was converted to a caloric value. We obtained a moderate correlation coefficient (r) of .76 between the accelerometer output and the VO2 (mL.kg-1.min-1) and a high correlation coefficient of .92 between the Ee and the accelerometer readings. The Caltrac accelerometer output (counts.min-1) was significantly higher (p less than .01) than the Ee (kcal.min-1) at the four walking speeds. The difference between the accelerometer output and the Ee ranged from 13.3% to 52.9%. The data were further analyzed with linear, polynomial, multiple, and stepwise regression models. The results of the analyses revealed that the Caltrac accelerometer output is a valid predictor of Ee during level walking when the appropriate regression equation is used to adjust the values.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

Physical Activity, Psychological and Functional Outcomes in Non-Ambulatory Stroke Patients during Rehabilitation-A Pilot Study.

Blaszcz M, Prucnal N, Wrzesniewski K, Pasiut S, Mika P, Kucia M J Clin Med. 2022; 11(24).

PMID: 36555878 PMC: 9781234. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11247260.


A systematic literature review of reviews on techniques for physical activity measurement in adults: a DEDIPAC study.

Dowd K, Szeklicki R, Minetto M, Murphy M, Polito A, Ghigo E Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018; 15(1):15.

PMID: 29422051 PMC: 5806271. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-017-0636-2.


Validation of the mywellness key in walking and running speeds.

Bergamin M, Ermolao A, Sieverdes J, Zaccaria M, Zanuso S J Sports Sci Med. 2013; 11(1):57-63.

PMID: 24149122 PMC: 3737851.


Step-down approach to behavioural weight loss treatment: a pilot of a randomised clinical trial.

Carels R, Hoffmann D, Hinman N, Burmeister J, Koball A, Ashrafioun L Psychol Health. 2013; 28(10):1121-34.

PMID: 23607537 PMC: 3865978. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2013.789875.


Is there a sex difference in accelerometer counts during walking in older adults?.

Van Domelen D, Caserotti P, Brychta R, Harris T, Patel K, Chen K J Phys Act Health. 2013; 11(3):626-37.

PMID: 23417023 PMC: 3716856. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.2012-0050.