» Articles » PMID: 27270080

Differential Sensitivity to Methylated DNA by ETS-family Transcription Factors is Intrinsically Encoded in Their DNA-binding Domains

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2016 Jun 9
PMID 27270080
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transactivation by the ETS family of transcription factors, whose members share structurally conserved DNA-binding domains, is variably sensitive to methylation of their target genes. The mechanism by which DNA methylation controls ETS proteins remains poorly understood. Uncertainly also pervades the effects of hemi-methylated DNA, which occurs following DNA replication and in response to hypomethylating agents, on site recognition by ETS proteins. To address these questions, we measured the affinities of two sequence-divergent ETS homologs, PU.1 and Ets-1, to DNA sites harboring a hemi- and fully methylated CpG dinucleotide. While the two proteins bound unmethylated DNA with indistinguishable affinity, their affinities to methylated DNA are markedly heterogeneous and exhibit major energetic coupling between the two CpG methylcytosines. Analysis of simulated DNA and existing co-crystal structures revealed that hemi-methylation induced non-local backbone and groove geometries that were not conserved in the fully methylated state. Indirect readout of these perturbations was differentially achieved by the two ETS homologs, with the distinctive interfacial hydration in PU.1/DNA binding moderating the inhibitory effects of DNA methylation on binding. This data established a biophysical basis for the pioneering properties associated with PU.1, which robustly bound fully methylated DNA, but not Ets-1, which was substantially inhibited.

Citing Articles

Maternal malnutrition in mice impairs nephrogenesis by disrupting DNA methylation of regulatory regions.

Makayes Y, Abergel E, Amleh A, Varshavsky D, Fok R, Azria B Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2024; 327(6):F1037-F1048.

PMID: 39417827 PMC: 11687838. DOI: 10.1152/ajprenal.00169.2024.


An update on the roles of transcription factor Ets1 in autoimmune diseases.

Garrett-Sinha L WIREs Mech Dis. 2023; 15(6):e1627.

PMID: 37565573 PMC: 10842644. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1627.


Batf stabilizes Th17 cell development via impaired Stat5 recruitment of Ets1-Runx1 complexes.

Pham D, Silberger D, Nguyen K, Gao M, Weaver C, Hatton R EMBO J. 2023; 42(8):e109803.

PMID: 36917143 PMC: 10106990. DOI: 10.15252/embj.2021109803.


DNMT3A-dependent DNA methylation is required for spermatogonial stem cells to commit to spermatogenesis.

Dura M, Teissandier A, Armand M, Barau J, Lapoujade C, Fouchet P Nat Genet. 2022; 54(4):469-480.

PMID: 35410378 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-022-01040-z.


Differential ETS1 binding to T:G mismatches within a CpG dinucleotide contributes to C-to-T somatic mutation rate of the IDH2 hotspot at codon Arg140.

Yang J, Gupta E, Horton J, Blumenthal R, Zhang X, Cheng X DNA Repair (Amst). 2022; 113:103306.

PMID: 35255310 PMC: 9411267. DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103306.


References
1.
Garvie C, Hagman J, Wolberger C . Structural studies of Ets-1/Pax5 complex formation on DNA. Mol Cell. 2002; 8(6):1267-76. DOI: 10.1016/s1097-2765(01)00410-5. View

2.
Szymczyna B, Arrowsmith C . DNA binding specificity studies of four ETS proteins support an indirect read-out mechanism of protein-DNA recognition. J Biol Chem. 2000; 275(37):28363-70. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M004294200. View

3.
Foxler D, James V, Shelton S, Vallim T, Shaw P, Sharp T . PU.1 is a major transcriptional activator of the tumour suppressor gene LIMD1. FEBS Lett. 2011; 585(7):1089-96. PMC: 3078326. DOI: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.03.013. View

4.
Jones P, Taylor S . Cellular differentiation, cytidine analogs and DNA methylation. Cell. 1980; 20(1):85-93. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(80)90237-8. View

5.
Petersen J, Skalicky J, Donaldson L, McIntosh L, Alber T, Graves B . Modulation of transcription factor Ets-1 DNA binding: DNA-induced unfolding of an alpha helix. Science. 1995; 269(5232):1866-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.7569926. View