» Articles » PMID: 27267903

Increased Uptake and Improved Outcomes of Bowel Cancer Screening with a Faecal Immunochemical Test: Results from a Pilot Study Within the National Screening Programme in England

Overview
Journal Gut
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 2016 Jun 9
PMID 27267903
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The National Health Service Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England uses a guaiac-based faecal occult blood test (gFOBt). A quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) for haemoglobin (Hb) has many advantages, including being specific for blood, detecting Hb at a much lower concentration with a single faecal sample and improved uptake.

Methods: In 2014, a large comparative pilot study was performed within BCSP to establish the acceptability and diagnostic performance of FIT. Over a 6-month period, 40 930 (1 in 28) subjects were sent a FIT (OC-SENSOR) instead of a gFOBt. A bespoke FIT package was used to mail FIT sampling devices to and from FIT subjects. All participants positive with either gFOBt or FIT (cut-off 20 µg Hb/g faeces) were referred for follow-up. Subgroup analysis included cut-off concentrations, age, sex, screening history and deprivation quintile.

Results: While overall uptake increased by over 7 percentage points with FIT (66.4% vs 59.3%, OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.33 to 1.38), uptake by previous non-responders almost doubled (FIT 23.9% vs gFOBt 12.5%, OR 2.20, 95% CI 2.10 to 2.29). The increase in overall uptake was significantly higher in men than women and was observed across all deprivation quintiles. With the conventional 20 µg/g cut-off, FIT positivity was 7.8% and ranged from 5.7% in 59-64-year-old women to 11.1% in 70-75-year-old men. Cancer detection increased twofold and that for advanced adenomas nearly fivefold. Detection rates remained higher with FIT for advanced adenomas, even at 180 µg Hb/g.

Conclusions: Markedly improved participation rates were achieved in a mature gFOBt-based national screening programme and disparities between men and women were reduced. High positivity rates, particularly in men and previous non-respondents, challenge the available colonoscopy resource, but improvements in neoplasia detection are still achievable within this limited resource.

Citing Articles

Effectiveness of behavior change techniques to address barriers to follow-up colonoscopy: results from an online survey and randomized factorial experiment.

Kerrison R, Gil N, Stoffel S, Hirst Y, Whitaker K, Rees C Ann Behav Med. 2024; 59(1).

PMID: 39739614 PMC: 11761676. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaae083.


FIT as a Comparator for Evaluating the Effectiveness of New Non-invasive CRC Screening Test.

Senore C, Doubeni C, Guittet L Dig Dis Sci. 2024; .

PMID: 39560807 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-024-08718-w.


Risk score model for predicting mortality among patients with lung cancer.

Huh Y, Kim H, Kim H, Son K Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1400049.

PMID: 39473493 PMC: 11520176. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1400049.


Performance of Faecal Immunochemical Testing for Colorectal Cancer Screening at Varying Positivity Thresholds.

Randel K, Botteri E, de Lange T, Schult A, Eskeland S, El-Safadi B Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2024; 61(1):122-131.

PMID: 39373173 PMC: 11636076. DOI: 10.1111/apt.18314.


Experience and satisfaction of participants in colorectal cancer screening programs: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Hortala C, Selva C, Sola I, Selva A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2293.

PMID: 39180046 PMC: 11342476. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19678-1.