» Articles » PMID: 27261509

DNMT1 Inhibition Reprograms Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells Via Upregulation of the MiR-17-92 Cluster

Overview
Journal Cancer Res
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 Jun 5
PMID 27261509
Citations 58
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and other carcinomas are hierarchically organized, with cancer stem cells (CSC) residing at the top of the hierarchy, where they drive tumor progression, metastasis, and chemoresistance. As CSC and non-CSC share an identical genetic background, we hypothesize that differences in epigenetics account for the striking functional differences between these two cell populations. Epigenetic mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, play an important role in maintaining pluripotency and regulating the differentiation of stem cells, but the role of DNA methylation in pancreatic CSC is obscure. In this study, we investigated the genome-wide DNA methylation profile of PDAC CSC, and we determined the importance of DNA methyltransferases for CSC maintenance and tumorigenicity. Using high-throughput methylation analysis, we discovered that sorted CSCs have a higher level of DNA methylation, regardless of the heterogeneity or polyclonality of the CSC populations present in the tumors analyzed. Mechanistically, CSC expressed higher DNMT1 levels than non-CSC. Pharmacologic or genetic targeting of DNMT1 in CSCs reduced their self-renewal and in vivo tumorigenic potential, defining DNMT1 as a candidate CSC therapeutic target. The inhibitory effect we observed was mediated in part through epigenetic reactivation of previously silenced miRNAs, in particular the miR-17-92 cluster. Together, our findings indicate that DNA methylation plays an important role in CSC biology and also provide a rationale to develop epigenetic modulators to target CSC plasticity and improve the poor outcome of PDAC patients. Cancer Res; 76(15); 4546-58. ©2016 AACR.

Citing Articles

Targeted Nanoparticle-Based Diagnostic and Treatment Options for Pancreatic Cancer.

Gu X, Minko T Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(8).

PMID: 38672671 PMC: 11048786. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081589.


Targeting cancer stem cell OXPHOS with tailored ruthenium complexes as a new anti-cancer strategy.

Alcala S, Villarino L, Ruiz-Canas L, Couceiro J, Martinez-Calvo M, Palencia-Campos A J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2024; 43(1):33.

PMID: 38281027 PMC: 10821268. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-023-02931-7.


Ubiquitin signaling in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Lv S, Zhang J, Peng X, Liu H, Liu Y, Wei F Front Mol Biosci. 2024; 10:1304639.

PMID: 38174069 PMC: 10761520. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1304639.


DNA methylation profiles in cancer: functions, therapy, and beyond.

Zhu J, Yang Y, Li L, Tang J, Zhang R Cancer Biol Med. 2023; 21(2).

PMID: 38062785 PMC: 10884540. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0403.


Effect of Withaferin-A, Withanone, and Caffeic Acid Phenethyl Ester on DNA Methyltransferases: Potential in Epigenetic Cancer Therapy.

Kumar V, Dhanjal J, Sari A, Khurana M, Kaul S, Wadhwa R Curr Top Med Chem. 2023; 24(4):379-391.

PMID: 37496252 DOI: 10.2174/1568026623666230726105017.


References
1.
Garcia-Silva S, Frias-Aldeguer J, Heeschen C . Stem cells & pancreatic cancer. Pancreatology. 2013; 13(2):110-3. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2012.12.003. View

2.
Patra S, Patra A, Zhao H, Dahiya R . DNA methyltransferase and demethylase in human prostate cancer. Mol Carcinog. 2002; 33(3):163-71. DOI: 10.1002/mc.10033. View

3.
Trowbridge J, Sinha A, Zhu N, Li M, Armstrong S, Orkin S . Haploinsufficiency of Dnmt1 impairs leukemia stem cell function through derepression of bivalent chromatin domains. Genes Dev. 2012; 26(4):344-9. PMC: 3289882. DOI: 10.1101/gad.184341.111. View

4.
Yoo C, Jones P . Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006; 5(1):37-50. DOI: 10.1038/nrd1930. View

5.
Sancho P, Burgos-Ramos E, Tavera A, Bou Kheir T, Jagust P, Schoenhals M . MYC/PGC-1α Balance Determines the Metabolic Phenotype and Plasticity of Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells. Cell Metab. 2015; 22(4):590-605. DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.08.015. View