» Articles » PMID: 27257959

A Comparative Study of Growth Kinetics, In Vitro Differentiation Potential and Molecular Characterization of Fetal Adnexa Derived Caprine Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 Jun 4
PMID 27257959
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present study was conducted with an objective of isolation, in vitro expansion, growth kinetics, molecular characterization and in vitro differentiation of fetal adnexa derived caprine mesenchymal stem cells. Mid-gestation gravid caprine uteri (2-3 months) were collected from abattoir to derive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from fetal adnexa {amniotic fluid (cAF), amniotic sac (cAS), Wharton's jelly (cWJ) and cord blood (cCB)} and expanded in vitro. These cultured MSCs were used at the 3rd passage (P3) to study growth kinetics, localization as well as molecular expression of specific surface antigens, pluripotency markers and mesenchymal tri-lineage differentiation. In comparison to cAF and cAS MSCs, cWJ and cCB MSCs showed significantly (P<0.05) higher clonogenic potency, faster growth rate and low population doubling (PDT) time. All the four types of MSCs were positive for alkaline phosphatase (AP) and differentiated into chondrogenic, osteogenic, and adipogenic lineages. These stem cells expressed MSC surface antigens (CD73, CD90 and CD105) and pluripotency markers (Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, KLF, cMyc, FoxD3) but did not express CD34, a hematopoietic stem cell marker (HSC) as confirmed by RT-PCR, immunocytochemistry and flow cytometric analysis. The relative mRNA expression of MSC surface antigens (CD73, CD90 and CD105) was significantly (P<0.05) higher in cWJ MSCs compared to the other cell lines. The mRNA expression of Oct4 was significantly (P<0.05) higher in cWJ, whereas mRNA expression of KLF and cMyc was significantly (P<0.05) higher in cWJ and cAF than that of cAS and cCB. The comparative assessment revealed that cWJ MSCs outperformed MSCs from other sources of fetal adnexa in terms of growth kinetics, relative mRNA expression of surface antigens, pluripotency markers and tri-lineage differentiation potential, hence, these MSCs could be used as a preferred source for regenerative medicine.

Citing Articles

Mesenchymal Stem Cells Isolated from Equine Hair Follicles Using a Method of Air-Liquid Interface.

Li H, Xiong S, Masieri F, Monika S, Lethaus B, Savkovic V Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2023; 19(8):2943-2956.

PMID: 37733199 PMC: 10661790. DOI: 10.1007/s12015-023-10619-w.


Amniotic Fluid Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Derived from Fetuses with Isolated Cardiac Defects Exhibit Decreased Proliferation and Cardiomyogenic Potential.

Jain M, Singh N, Fatima R, Nachanekar A, Pradhan M, Nityanand S Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(4).

PMID: 37106752 PMC: 10136182. DOI: 10.3390/biology12040552.


Comparison of and Gene Expression in Leukapheresis-Derived CD34+ Cells before and during Cell Culture.

Swistowska M, Gil-Kulik P, Czop M, Wieczorek K, Macheta A, Petniak A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(4).

PMID: 36835597 PMC: 9962001. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24044186.


Wharton's jelly-derived stromal cells and their cell therapy applications in allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Pochon C, Notarantonio A, Laroye C, Reppel L, Bensoussan D, Bertrand A J Cell Mol Med. 2022; 26(5):1339-1350.

PMID: 35088933 PMC: 8899189. DOI: 10.1111/jcmm.17105.


Impact of donor nutritional balance on the growth and development of mesenchymal stem cells from caprine umbilical cord Wharton´s jelly.

Alves J, Rossetto R, Fernandes C, Montenegro A, Marques I, Cavalcanti C Vet Res Commun. 2021; 46(1):169-182.

PMID: 34625865 DOI: 10.1007/s11259-021-09843-x.


References
1.
Reynolds L, Borowicz P, Vonnahme K, Johnson M, Grazul-Bilska A, Wallace J . Animal models of placental angiogenesis. Placenta. 2005; 26(10):689-708. DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2004.11.010. View

2.
Mann A, Yadav R, Singh J, Kumar D, Singh B, Yadav P . Culture, characterization and differentiation of cells from buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) amnion. Cytotechnology. 2012; 65(1):23-30. PMC: 3536876. DOI: 10.1007/s10616-012-9464-z. View

3.
Udehiya R, Amarpal , Aithal H, Kinjavdekar P, Pawde A, Singh R . Comparison of autogenic and allogenic bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells for repair of segmental bone defects in rabbits. Res Vet Sci. 2013; 94(3):743-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2013.01.011. View

4.
Kern S, Eichler H, Stoeve J, Kluter H, Bieback K . Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells. 2006; 24(5):1294-301. DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342. View

5.
Roubelakis M, Trohatou O, Anagnou N . Amniotic fluid and amniotic membrane stem cells: marker discovery. Stem Cells Int. 2012; 2012:107836. PMC: 3372280. DOI: 10.1155/2012/107836. View