Article: What Do Physicians Believe About the Way Decisions Are Made? A Pilot Study on Metacognitive Knowledge in the Medical Context

Metacognition relative to medical decision making has been poorly investigated to date. However, beliefs about methods of decision making (metacognition) play a fundamental role in determining the efficiency of the decision itself. In the present study, we investigated a set of beliefs that physicians develop in relation to the modes of making decisions in a professional environment. The Solomon Questionnaire, designed to assess metacognitive knowledge about behaviors and mental processes involved in decision making, was administered to a sample of 18 emergency physicians, 18 surgeons, and 18 internists. Significant differences in metacognitive knowledge emerged among these three medical areas. Physicians' self-reports about the decision process mirrored the peculiarities of the context in which they operate. Their metacognitive knowledge demonstrated a reflective attitude that is an effective tool during the decision making process.

Citing Articles

Reclaiming magical incantation in graduate medical education.

Katz J, George D Clin Rheumatol. 2019; 39(3):703-707.

PMID: 31724095 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-019-04812-x.

What moves the rheumatologist? Unravelling decision making in the referral of systemic sclerosis patients to health professionals: a qualitative study.

Stocker J, Cup E, Vonk M, van den Hoogen F, Nijhuis-van Der Sanden M, Staal J Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2019; 2(2):rky027.

PMID: 31431973 PMC: 6649894. DOI: 10.1093/rap/rky027.

Preference of cognitive approaches for decision making among anesthesiologists' in Saudi Arabia.

Alshaalan A, Alharbi M, Alattas K Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13(3):191-196.

PMID: 31333362 PMC: 6625279. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_792_18.

Clinical Decision-making among Emergency Physicians: Experiential or Rational?.

Aldamiri K, Alhusain F, Almoamary A, Alshehri K, Al Jerian N J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2019; 8(1-2):65-68.

PMID: 30859790 PMC: 7325819. DOI: 10.2991/j.jegh.2018.04.102.

Ambiguity and uncertainty tolerance, need for cognition, and their association with stress. A study among Italian practicing physicians.

Iannello P, Mottini A, Tirelli S, Riva S, Antonietti A Med Educ Online. 2017; 22(1):1270009.

PMID: 28178917 PMC: 5328324. DOI: 10.1080/10872981.2016.1270009.

References

1.

Murphy J, Stee L, McEvoy M, Oshiro J . Journal reporting of medical errors: the wisdom of Solomon, the bravery of Achilles, and the foolishness of Pan. Chest. 2007; 131(3):890-896. DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-2420. View

2.

Marewski J, Gigerenzer G . Heuristic decision making in medicine. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2012; 14(1):77-89. PMC: 3341653. View

3.

Riva S, Monti M, Iannello P, Antonietti A . The representation of risk in routine medical experience: what actions for contemporary health policy?. PLoS One. 2012; 7(11):e48297. PMC: 3486855. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048297. View

4.

Riva S, Monti M, Antonietti A . Simple heuristics in over-the-counter drug choices: a new hint for medical education and practice. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2013; 2:59-70. PMC: 3661247. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S13004. View

5.

Croskerry P . The cognitive imperative: thinking about how we think. Acad Emerg Med. 2000; 7(11):1223-31. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2000.tb00467.x. View

6.

Lucchiari C, Pravettoni G . Cognitive balanced model: a conceptual scheme of diagnostic decision making. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 18(1):82-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2011.01771.x. View

7.

Pines J . Profiles in patient safety: confirmation bias in emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med. 2005; 13(1):90-4. DOI: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.07.028. View

8.

Allnutt M . Human factors in accidents. 1987. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 11(4):369-74; discussion 374-5. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.4.369. View

9.

Riva S, Monti M, Iannello P, Pravettoni G, Schulz P, Antonietti A . A preliminary mixed-method investigation of trust and hidden signals in medical consultations. PLoS One. 2014; 9(3):e90941. PMC: 3949702. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0090941. View

10.

Tversky A, Kahneman D . Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science. 1974; 185(4157):1124-31. DOI: 10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. View

11.

Marcum J . An integrated model of clinical reasoning: dual-process theory of cognition and metacognition. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012; 18(5):954-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01900.x. View

12.

Croskerry P . Achieving quality in clinical decision making: cognitive strategies and detection of bias. Acad Emerg Med. 2002; 9(11):1184-204. DOI: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01574.x. View