» Articles » PMID: 27241681

Effects of Smoking Status on Device Survival Among Individuals Undergoing Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement

Overview
Date 2016 Jun 1
PMID 27241681
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Smoking is an established risk factor for wound complications. There is limited data on the impact of smoking on artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) outcomes. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess AUS device survival outcomes based on smoking status. From 1985 to 2014, 1,270 patients underwent AUS placement with 728 having smoking status available for review. Smoking status was categorized as never, prior, and active smokers. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to evaluate differences in survival, including overall device and erosion/infection-free survival. Hazard regression analysis was utilized to determine the association between smoking and device outcomes. Of the 728 patients in the study, 401 had a history of smoking with 41 active smokers and 360 never smokers at the time of AUS implant. When compared with nonsmokers, past smokers had a higher rate of hypertension and prior transient ischemic attack. Clinical comorbidities were similar between nonsmokers and active smokers. On univariate analysis, patient age, history of transient ischemic attack, diabetes, and coronary artery disease were significantly associated with infection/erosion rate, but prior or active smoking statuses were not. Likewise, when comparing smokers (past or active) with lifelong nonsmokers, there was no significant difference in 1- and 5-year overall device survival. There was no evidence for adverse AUS outcomes in current or past smokers compared with nonsmokers. Given the established risk of perioperative complications secondary to smoking, the recommendation should still be to counsel patients to quit prior to undergoing AUS placement. External validation of these findings is needed.

Citing Articles

Artificial urinary sphincter erosion and infection: a contemporary review of perioperative considerations and management.

Desai T, Rozanski A Transl Androl Urol. 2024; 13(5):857-867.

PMID: 38855596 PMC: 11157387. DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-488.


Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: A Narrative Review.

Frazier R, Jones M, Hofer M J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610677 PMC: 11012791. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071913.


The "Minimal-Touch" Technique for Artificial Urinary Sphincter Placement: Description and Outcomes.

Ziegelmann M, Hebert K, Linder B, Rangel L, Elliott D Urol Res Pract. 2023; 49(1):40-47.

PMID: 37877837 PMC: 10081129. DOI: 10.5152/tud.2023.22136.


A global, propensity-score matched analysis of patients receiving artificial urinary sphincters and the risk of complications, infections, and re-interventions.

Prebay Z, Ebbott D, Foss H, Li M, Chung P Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(5):832-839.

PMID: 37305625 PMC: 10251084. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-631.


Management of male stress urinary incontinence in high-risk patients: a narrative review.

Lin J, Skokan A, Wessells H, Hagedorn J Transl Androl Urol. 2023; 12(5):898-917.

PMID: 37305622 PMC: 10251105. DOI: 10.21037/tau-22-727.


References
1.
Wang R, McGuire E, He C, Faerber G, Latini J . Long-term outcomes after primary failures of artificial urinary sphincter implantation. Urology. 2012; 79(4):922-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.11.051. View

2.
Sorensen L . Wound healing and infection in surgery. The clinical impact of smoking and smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Surg. 2012; 147(4):373-83. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.2012.5. View

3.
Myles P, Iacono G, Hunt J, Fletcher H, Morris J, McIlroy D . Risk of respiratory complications and wound infection in patients undergoing ambulatory surgery: smokers versus nonsmokers. Anesthesiology. 2002; 97(4):842-7. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00015. View

4.
Lai H, Hsu E, Teh B, Butler E, Boone T . 13 years of experience with artificial urinary sphincter implantation at Baylor College of Medicine. J Urol. 2007; 177(3):1021-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.062. View

5.
Linder B, de Cogain M, Elliott D . Long-term device outcomes of artificial urinary sphincter reimplantation following prior explantation for erosion or infection. J Urol. 2013; 191(3):734-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.08.089. View