» Articles » PMID: 27239174

Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumors and Fibroadenomas Based on Mammographic Sonographic and MRI Features

Overview
Publisher Karger
Date 2016 May 31
PMID 27239174
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This study was performed to compare the mammographic, sonographic, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas, which may resemble each other.

Methods: Preoperative mammograms, B-mode and Doppler sonograms, and dynamic breast MRIs of 72 patients with pathologically proven fibroadenomas and 70 patients with pathologically proven phyllodes tumor were evaluated in this retrospective study. Statistical significance was evaluated using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Correlations in lesion size among radiological methods were examined by Pearson's correlation analysis.

Results: The features that differed on mammogram were size, shape, and margin of the mass. Sonograms showed significant differences in size, shape, margin, echo pattern, and vascularization of the mass. Pearson's correlation analysis showed strong agreement among radiological methods in terms of assessment of size. Tumor size ≥ 3 cm, irregular shape, microlobulated margins, complex internal echo pattern, and hypervascularity were significant findings of phyllodes tumors. Internal cystic areas on MRI were frequently associated with phyllodes tumors.

Conclusion: Mammographic, sonographic, and MRI findings of fibroadenomas and phyllodes tumors could help radiologists to ascertain imaging-histological concordance and guide clinicians in their decision making regarding adequate follow-up or the necessity of biopsy.

Citing Articles

Malignant phyllodes tumor of the breast with bilateral ductal carcinoma in situ and postoperative distant metastasis: a case report.

Liu H, Wang B, Chen Y Transl Cancer Res. 2024; 13(11):6576-6583.

PMID: 39697724 PMC: 11651784. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-497.


Benign and malignant breast lesions in children and adolescents - diagnostic and therapeutic approach.

Sosnowska-Sienkiewicz P, Januszkiewicz-Lewandowska D, Mankowski P Front Pediatr. 2024; 12:1417050.

PMID: 39507494 PMC: 11537988. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1417050.


Differentiation Between Phyllodes Tumor and Fibroadenoma of the Breast: A Radiomics Prediction Model Based on Full-Field Digital Mammography & Digital Tomosynthesis.

Zeng F, Zeng H, Yang J, Huang D, Liu J, Wen C Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 23:15330338241289474.

PMID: 39376181 PMC: 11612266. DOI: 10.1177/15330338241289474.


Malignant Phyllodes Tumor With Chondroblastic Osteosarcomatous Differentiation: A Case Report.

Carpenter M, Masood S, Sharma S, Makary R, Hatch P, Marji N Cureus. 2024; 16(7):e63915.

PMID: 39105035 PMC: 11298328. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63915.


A Comprehensive Review of Breast Fibroadenoma: Correlating Clinical and Pathological Findings.

Ramala Jr S, Chandak S, Chandak M, Annareddy S Cureus. 2024; 15(12):e49948.

PMID: 38179396 PMC: 10765224. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49948.


References
1.
Bode M, Rissanen T, Apaja-Sarkkinen M . Ultrasonography and core needle biopsy in the differential diagnosis of fibroadenoma and tumor phyllodes. Acta Radiol. 2007; 48(7):708-13. DOI: 10.1080/02841850701367911. View

2.
Kuhl C, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J . Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology. 1999; 211(1):101-10. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.211.1.r99ap38101. View

3.
Harper A, Noe J, Bies J, Jackson V . Ultrasound in the evaluation of solid breast masses. Radiology. 1983; 146(3):731-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6298858. View

4.
Hochman M, Orel S, Powell C, SCHNALL M, Reynolds C, White L . Fibroadenomas: MR imaging appearances with radiologic-histopathologic correlation. Radiology. 1997; 204(1):123-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.204.1.9205233. View

5.
Jorge Blanco A, Vargas Serrano B, Rodriguez Romero R, Martinez Cendejas E . Phyllodes tumors of the breast. Eur Radiol. 1999; 9(2):356-60. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050680. View