» Articles » PMID: 27239096

Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychology
Date 2016 May 31
PMID 27239096
Citations 307
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) is a widely-used, theoretically-driven, and psychometrically-sound self-report measure of emotion regulation difficulties. However, at 36-items, the DERS may be challenging to administer in some situations or settings (e.g., in the course of patient care or large-scale epidemiological studies). Consequently, there is a need a briefer version of the DERS. The goal of the present studies was to develop and evaluate a 16-item version of the DERS - the DERS-16. The reliability and validity of the DERS-16 were examined in a clinical sample (N = 96) and two large community samples (Ns = 102 and 482). The validity of the DERS-16 was evaluated comparing the relative strength of the association of the two versions of the DERS with measures of emotion regulation and related constructs, psychopathology, and clinically-relevant behaviors theorized to stem from emotion regulation deficits. Results demonstrate that the DERS-16 has retained excellent internal consistency, good test-retest reliability, and good convergent and discriminant validity. Further, the DERS-16 showed minimal differences in its convergent and discriminant validity with relevant measures when compared to the original DERS. In conclusion, the DERS-16 offers a valid and brief method for the assessment of overall emotion regulation difficulties.

Citing Articles

The Psychobiological Toll of Chronic Conflict: Posttraumatic Stress Symptoms, Emotion Dysregulation, and Physiology in a Conflict-Exposed Community in South Sudan.

Lee K, Beranbaum S, Khedari-DePierro V, Yates E, Yacevich I, Shankar A Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2025; 9:24705470251324783.

PMID: 40079047 PMC: 11898085. DOI: 10.1177/24705470251324783.


Autism, ADHD, and Their Traits in Adults with Obesity: A Scoping Review.

Makin L, Meyer A, Zesch E, Mondelli V, Tchanturia K Nutrients. 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40077657 PMC: 11901760. DOI: 10.3390/nu17050787.


Assessing emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents: validation and clinical utility of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale, 16-item.

Larsson K, Aspeqvist E, Falkenstrom F, Andersson G, Svedin C, Zetterqvist M BMC Psychol. 2025; 13(1):237.

PMID: 40075543 PMC: 11905734. DOI: 10.1186/s40359-025-02540-3.


Work engagement among new nurses in China: a latent profile analysis.

Xiong X, Huang X, Shi C, Xu Z, Rao X BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e087497.

PMID: 40074257 PMC: 11904320. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-087497.


Exploring the Validity of Adolescent Responses to a Measure of Psychological Flexibility and Inflexibility.

Farley C, Renshaw T Behav Sci (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40001828 PMC: 11852026. DOI: 10.3390/bs15020197.


References
1.
Kuo J, Khoury J, Metcalfe R, Fitzpatrick S, Goodwill A . An examination of the relationship between childhood emotional abuse and borderline personality disorder features: the role of difficulties with emotion regulation. Child Abuse Negl. 2014; 39:147-55. DOI: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.08.008. View

2.
Gross J, John O . Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003; 85(2):348-62. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348. View

3.
Goodman M, Carpenter D, Tang C, Goldstein K, Avedon J, Fernandez N . Dialectical behavior therapy alters emotion regulation and amygdala activity in patients with borderline personality disorder. J Psychiatr Res. 2014; 57:108-16. PMC: 4263347. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.06.020. View

4.
Gratz K, Tull M . Exploring the relationship between posttraumatic stress disorder and deliberate self-harm: the moderating roles of borderline and avoidant personality disorders. Psychiatry Res. 2012; 199(1):19-23. PMC: 3407331. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.03.025. View

5.
Zou G . Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. Psychol Methods. 2008; 12(4):399-413. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.12.4.399. View