Right Ventricular Long Axis Strain-validation of a Novel Parameter in Non-ischemic Dilated Cardiomyopathy Using Standard Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Purpose: Right ventricular longitudinal axis strain (RV-LAS) is a simple measure of RV longitudinal function. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of its diagnostic performance in non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and the determination of reference values in controls.
Methods: 217 NIDCM patients and 200 healthy controls were analysed retrospectively regarding the diagnostic performance of RV-LAS using receiver operating characteristic curves in comparison with RV ejection fraction (RVEF), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) and global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS). Hereby, four different approaches were evaluated to assess RV-LAS based on different reference points. RV-LAS LVapex/mid was defined as the change in distance between the LV apex and the middle of a line connecting the origins of the tricuspidal valve leaflets in systole and diastole. The ethical approval was obtained in all participants.
Results: NIDCM and controls were 48 years in mean. Controls were equally gender distributed, while the proportion of men with NIDCM was higher with 77%. Among the four approaches RV-LAS LVapex/mid provided the highest diagnostic performance for discrimination between NIDCM and controls (AUC=0.94). Of all RV functional parameters RV-LAS LVapex/mid preformed significantly better than RVEF (delta AUC=0.05; p=0.003), TAPSE (delta AUC=0.23; p<0.0001) and RV-GLS (delta AUC=0.31; p<0.0001). A significant correlation was found between RV-LAS LVapex/mid and RVEF (r=-0.65; p<0.0001). The reference mean values for RV-LAS LVapex/mid were -17.4±3.5 for men and -18.5±3.7 for women.
Conclusion: RV-LAS showed better diagnostic accuracy for RV dysfunction than RVEF, TAPSE and RV-GLS. Furthermore, it has a rapid accessibility and low intra- and interobserver variability.
Backhaus S, Schulz A, Lange T, Rosel S, Schmidt-Schweda L, Kutty S Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4090.
PMID: 39900615 PMC: 11791045. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87032-5.
Shang Y, Zhang Y, Leng W, Lei X, Chen L, Zhou X Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022; 12(2):1539-1548.
PMID: 35111646 PMC: 8739089. DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-376.
van Veelen A, Elias J, van Dongen I, Hoebers L, Claessen B, Ramunddal T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 38(3):631-641.
PMID: 34554368 PMC: 8926979. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-021-02423-9.
Arenja N, Riffel J, Halder M, Djiokou C, Fritz T, Florian Andre Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(9):3913-3923.
PMID: 28188427 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4729-0.