» Articles » PMID: 27232893

The Effects of Age, Refractive Status, and Luminance on Pupil Size

Overview
Journal Optom Vis Sci
Date 2016 May 28
PMID 27232893
Citations 62
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Pupil size is critical for optimal performance of presbyopic contact lenses. Although the effect of luminance is well known, little information is available regarding other contributing factors such as aging and refractive status.

Methods: The cohort population comprised 304 patients (127 male, 177 female) aged 18 to 78 years. Pupils were photographed at three controlled luminance levels 250, 50, and 2.5 cd/m using an infra-red macro video camera. Measurements of pupil diameter were conducted after transforming pixel values to linear values in millimeters.

Results: Luminance was the most influential factor with pupil diameter increasing with decreased luminance (p < 0.001, all comparisons). Age was also found to be a significant factor with a smaller diameter in the older groups, but overall the difference was only significant between the pre-presbyopes and the established presbyopes (p = 0.017). Pupil diameter decreased significantly with increasing age, the effect being most marked at low luminance (<0.001). The smallest pupil diameters were measured for hyperopes and the largest for myopes and although refractive error was not a significant factor alone, there was a significant interaction between luminance and refractive error with the greatest differences in pupil diameter between myopes and emmetropes at low luminance (p < 0.001). Pupil diameter changes modeled by multilinear regression (p < 0.001) identified age, luminance, best sphere refraction, and refractive error as significant factors accounting for just over 70% of the average variation in pupil diameter.

Conclusions: Both age and refractive status were found to affect pupil size with larger pupils measured for younger patients and myopes. Designs for multifocal contact lens corrections should take both age and refractive status into consideration; a faster progression from distance to near corrections across the optical zone of the lens is expected to be required for established presbyopes and hyperopes than it is for early presbyopes, myopes, and emmetropes.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of Replacement Hearing Aids in Cochlear Implant Candidates Using the Hearing in Noise Test (HINT) and Pupillometry.

Jakobsen Y, Faulkner K, Van Yper L, Schmidt J Audiol Res. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39997157 PMC: 11851937. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres15010013.


Eye reactions under the influence of drugs of abuse as measured by smartphones: a controlled clinical study in healthy volunteers.

Kuijpers K, Andersson K, Winkvist M, Niesters M, van Velzen M, Nyberg F Front Neurosci. 2025; 18():1492246.

PMID: 39840007 PMC: 11748063. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1492246.


Contrast sensitivity before and after refractive error correction among refractive error patients in Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia 2023.

Kebede B, Seid S, Samuel E BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):11.

PMID: 39773074 PMC: 11708259. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03817-8.


Foveal neural adaptation to optically induced contrast reduction.

Roth A, Breher K, Domdei N, Wahl S J Vis. 2024; 24(9):13.

PMID: 39287597 PMC: 11412604. DOI: 10.1167/jov.24.9.13.


Are the Hypo-Reflective Clumps Associated With Age-Related Macular Degeneration in Adaptive Optics Ophthalmoscopy Autofluorescent?.

Borella Y, Danielsen N, Markle E, Snyder V, Lee D, Zhang M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2024; 65(10):28.

PMID: 39167400 PMC: 11343010. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.65.10.28.


References
1.
Ellis C . The pupillary light reflex in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol. 1981; 65(11):754-9. PMC: 1039657. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.65.11.754. View

2.
Orr J, Seidel D, Day M, Gray L . Is Pupil Diameter Influenced by Refractive Error?. Optom Vis Sci. 2015; 92(7):834-40. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000000627. View

3.
Watson A, Yellott J . A unified formula for light-adapted pupil size. J Vis. 2012; 12(10):12. DOI: 10.1167/12.10.12. View

4.
BIRREN J, CASPERSON R, BOTWINICK J . Age changes in pupil size. J Gerontol. 1950; 5(3):216-21. DOI: 10.1093/geronj/5.3.216. View

5.
Chateau N, Baude D . Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses. Optom Vis Sci. 1997; 74(7):532-9. DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199707000-00022. View