» Articles » PMID: 27231412

A New Provocative Test for Glaucoma

Overview
Date 2016 May 28
PMID 27231412
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To compare the effects of the water-drinking test (WDT) with the 30° inverted body position test on intraocular pressure (IOP) in normal patients, suspected glaucoma patients and glaucoma patients.

Materials And Methods: Based on clinical evaluation of the optic disk, IOP, and standard achromatic perimetry (SAP) of 71 eyes, 18 were "normal" (normal SAP and optic disk evaluation, and IOP < 21 mm Hg), 30 were "glaucoma suspect" (GS; normal SAP, cup/disk (C/D) ratio > 0.5 or asymmetry > 0.2 and/or ocular hypertension), and 31 had "early glaucoma" (MD < -6 dB, glaucomatous optic neuropathy). Standard achromatic perimetry was performed with the Octopus 3.1.1 Dynamic 24-2 program. Patients fasted before the WDT, and four measurements were performed at basal, 15', 30, and 45' after drinking 1 liter of water (WDT) in 5 minutes. In the 30° inverted position, IOP measurement with Perkins applanation tonometer was taken after 5 minutes lying down.

Results: There was a statistical difference in all groups between the basal IOP and peak IOP during the WDT (p < 0.001) and in the inverted position IOP (p < 0.001). Controls (p = 0.50), suspects (p = 0.41) and glaucoma patients (p = 1.0) did not exhibit a difference between WDT-IOP and inverted position IOP.

Conclusion: The 30° inverted position test was as efficient as WDT in detecting peak IOP. This new provocative test is easier, faster and more comfortable for both patients and doctors. How to cite this article: Kanadani FN, Moreira TCA, Campos LF, Vianello MP, Corradi J, Dorairaj SK, Freitas ALA, Ritch R. A New Provocative Test for Glaucoma. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2016;10(1): 1-3.

Citing Articles

Assessing the value of the water drinking test in glaucoma-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jin E, Goh C, Betzler B, Heng C, Ang B Eye (Lond). 2024; 38(14):2688-2700.

PMID: 38714837 PMC: 11427712. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-024-03107-z.


Assessment of short-term intraocular pressure parameters in phakic and pseudophakic patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.

Lourenco A, Araujo C, Santos P, Prata T, Lopes N, Santos R Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2021; 84(5):425-429.

PMID: 34320100 PMC: 11878431. DOI: 10.5935/0004-2749.20210066.

References
1.
Baskaran M, Raman K, Ramani K, Roy J, Vijaya L, Badrinath S . Intraocular pressure changes and ocular biometry during Sirsasana (headstand posture) in yoga practitioners. Ophthalmology. 2006; 113(8):1327-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2006.02.063. View

2.
Drance S . DIURNAL VARIATION OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE IN TREATED GLAUCOMA. SIGNIFICANCE IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC SIMPLE GLAUCOMA. Arch Ophthalmol. 1963; 70:302-11. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1963.00960050304004. View

3.
Kidd M, OConnor M . Progression of field loss after trabeculectomy: a five-year follow-up. Br J Ophthalmol. 1985; 69(11):827-31. PMC: 1040753. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.69.11.827. View

4.
Chauhan B, Nicolela M, McCORMICK T, LeBlanc R . Intraocular pressure and progression of glaucomatous visual field loss. Am J Ophthalmol. 2000; 129(3):302-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(99)00387-6. View

5.
Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Viana M . Association between intraocular pressure peaks and progression of visual field loss. Ophthalmology. 1991; 98(1):64-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(91)32340-6. View