» Articles » PMID: 27229478

Comparison of Qualitative and Semiquantitative Strain Elastography in Breast Lesions for Diagnostic Accuracy

Overview
Journal Cancer Imaging
Publisher Springer Nature
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2016 May 28
PMID 27229478
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Strain elastography can be purely qualitative or semiquantitative using both strain score and strain ratio. The aim of this study was to establish the accuracy of semiquantitative elastography using both strain score and strain ratio in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. The diagnostic performance of the two methods was analysed for any statistically significant difference.

Methods: A prospective study was carried out from May to December 2014 in the University of Nairobi, Department of Diagnostic Imaging and Radiation Medicine. One hundred and eighteen patients referred for breast ultrasound following clinical detection of masses certified the inclusion criteria. All solid masses identified on grey scale imaging were subjected to strain elastography. Elastographic findings were represented in both strain score and strain ratio. Comparison of diagnostic performance with histological findings as the gold standard for all detected solid masses was done. Fisher's exact test and receiver operating characteristics curves were applied for statistical analysis to look for any significant differences between the diagnostic performance of strain score and strain ratio.

Results: Out of the 118, three patients did not attend for all the examinations and three biopsy results were misplaced therefore analysis was done for 112 subjects. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of elasticity strain (Ueno) score were 0.86, 0.96, 0.89 and 0.96 respectively. For the strain ratio the values were 0.93, 0.96, 0.90 and 0.96 respectively. Fisher's exact test P values comparing the sensitivity and specificity were 0.69 and 1.00 respectively not considered significant at p 0.05 levels. The areas under the curve (AUCs) from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.972 and 0.976 for strain score and ratio respectively with a strong Pearson's correlation coefficient, r 0.79 indicating a high diagnostic accuracy for both methods but no statistically significant difference in performance.

Conclusion: Semiquantitative ultrasound elastography has good diagnostic accuracy in differentiating benign and malignant breast solid lesions and there is no statistically significant difference between strain score and strain ratio in sensitivity, specificity and accuracy.

Citing Articles

A human pilot study on positive electrostatic charge effects in solid tumors of the late-stage metastatic patients.

Zandi A, Shojaeian F, Abbasvandi F, Faranoush M, Anbiaee R, Hoseinpour P Front Med (Lausanne). 2023; 10:1195026.

PMID: 37915327 PMC: 10616960. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1195026.


Applications of elastography in operative neurosurgery: A systematic review.

Hersh A, Weber-Levine C, Jiang K, Young L, Kerensky M, Routkevitch D J Clin Neurosci. 2022; 104:18-28.

PMID: 35933785 PMC: 11023619. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2022.07.019.


Determining the elastography strain ratio cut off value for differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Musila Mutala T, Mwango G, Aywak A, Cioni D, Neri E Cancer Imaging. 2022; 22(1):12.

PMID: 35151365 PMC: 8841096. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-022-00447-5.


Added Value of a New Strain Elastography Technique in Conventional Ultrasound for the Diagnosis of Breast Masses: A Prospective Multicenter Study.

Wei Q, Yan Y, Wu G, Ye X, Jiang F, Liu J Front Oncol. 2021; 11:779612.

PMID: 34858859 PMC: 8631107. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.779612.


Evaluating the usefulness of breast strain elastography for intraductal lesions.

Kokubu Y, Yamada K, Tanabe M, Izumori A, Kato C, Horii R J Med Ultrason (2001). 2021; 48(1):63-70.

PMID: 33389371 PMC: 7882591. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-020-01070-2.


References
1.
Giuseppetti G, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, Baldassarre S . Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report. Radiol Med. 2005; 110(1-2):69-76. View

2.
Schaefer F, Heer I, Schaefer P, Mundhenke C, Osterholz S, Order B . Breast ultrasound elastography--results of 193 breast lesions in a prospective study with histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 77(3):450-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.08.026. View

3.
Falou O, Sadeghi-Naini A, Prematilake S, Sofroni E, Papanicolau N, Iradji S . Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in women with locally advanced breast cancer using ultrasound elastography. Transl Oncol. 2013; 6(1):17-24. PMC: 3573650. DOI: 10.1593/tlo.12412. View

4.
Evans A, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Brauer K, Jordan L, Purdie C . Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses: value of shear wave elastography according to lesion stiffness combined with greyscale ultrasound according to BI-RADS classification. Br J Cancer. 2012; 107(2):224-9. PMC: 3394981. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.253. View

5.
Parajuly S, Lan P, Yun M, Gang Y, Hua Z . Diagnostic potential of strain ratio measurement and a 5 point scoring method for detection of breast cancer: Chinese experience. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13(4):1447-52. DOI: 10.7314/apjcp.2012.13.4.1447. View