» Articles » PMID: 27225386

Bond Strengths of Brackets Bonded to Enamel Surfaces Conditioned with Femtosecond and Er:YAG Laser Systems

Overview
Journal Lasers Med Sci
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 May 27
PMID 27225386
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare femtosecond and Er:YAG laser systems with regard to enamel demineralization and bracket bond strength. Human-extracted premolars were randomized to three groups (n = 17) depending on the conditioning treatment used for the buccal surfaces: 37 % orthophosphoric acid, Er:YAG laser etching (MSP mode 120 mJ, 10 Hz, 1.2 W), and femtosecond laser etching (0.4 W, 800 nm, 90 fs/pulse, 1 kHz). Metal brackets were bonded with Transbond XT to the conditioned surfaces and light cured for 20 s. The samples were thermocycled (5000 cycles, 5-55 °C) and subjected to shear bond strength (SBS) testing using a universal testing machine. Failure types were analyzed under an optical stereomicroscope and SEM. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was evaluated to assess residual adhesive on the enamel surface. The results revealed no significant differences in SBS between the Er:YAG laser (7.2 ± 3.3 MPa) and acid etching groups (7.3 ± 2.7 MPa; p < 0.05), whereas a significant difference was observed between the femtosecond laser etching group (3.3 ± 1.2 MPa) and the other two groups (p < 0.01). ARI scores were significantly different among the three groups. The results of our study suggest that laser conditioning with an Er:YAG system results in successful etching, similar to that obtained with acid. The sole use of a femtosecond laser system may not provide an adequate bond strength at the bracket-enamel interface.

Citing Articles

Effects of femtosecond laser on hard dental tissues: A scoping review.

Javed F, Akhter R, Miletic V Lasers Med Sci. 2024; 39(1):286.

PMID: 39567415 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-024-04225-6.


Shear bond strength of a self-adhesive resin cement to dentin surface treated with Nd:YAG and femtosecond lasers.

Ozdogan M, Karaokutan I, Yildirim M, Aydemir K, Karatay A, Aykent F Lasers Med Sci. 2020; 36(1):219-226.

PMID: 32869119 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03138-4.


Evaluation of bond strength of resin cement to Er:YAG laser-etched enamel and dentin after cementation of ceramic discs.

Ismatullaev A, Tasin S, Usumez A Lasers Med Sci. 2020; 36(2):447-454.

PMID: 32696424 DOI: 10.1007/s10103-020-03103-1.


Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets on Resin Nanoceramic Material With Different Surface Treatments.

Kara M, Demir O, Dogru M Turk J Orthod. 2020; 33(2):115-122.

PMID: 32637193 PMC: 7316482. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.19103.


Effect of Er: YAG laser etching on shear bond strength of orthodontic bracket.

Sallam R, Arnout E Saudi Med J. 2018; 39(9):922-927.

PMID: 30251736 PMC: 6201001. DOI: 10.15537/smj.2018.9.22793.


References
1.
Kim J, Kwon O, Kim H, Kwon Y . Effectiveness of an Er:YAG laser in etching the enamel surface for orthodontic bracket retention. Dent Mater J. 2006; 24(4):596-602. DOI: 10.4012/dmj.24.596. View

2.
BUONOCORE M . A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res. 1955; 34(6):849-53. DOI: 10.1177/00220345550340060801. View

3.
Haydar B, Sarikaya S, Cehreli Z . Comparison of shear bond strength of three bonding agents with metal and ceramic brackets. Angle Orthod. 1999; 69(5):457-62. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1999)069<0457:COSBSO>2.3.CO;2. View

4.
Boyd H, ZATERKA S, Eisig J, Chinzon D, Iriya K, Laudanna A . Helicobacter pylori and refractory duodenal ulcers: cross-over comparison of continued cimetidine with cimetidine plus antimicrobials. Am J Gastroenterol. 1994; 89(9):1505-10. View

5.
Van Meerbeek B, Vanherle G, Lambrechts P, Braem M . Dentin- and enamel-bonding agents. Curr Opin Dent. 1992; 2:117-27. View