» Articles » PMID: 27220855

A Comparison of Wearable Fitness Devices

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 May 26
PMID 27220855
Citations 53
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Wearable trackers can help motivate you during workouts and provide information about your daily routine or fitness in combination with your smartphone without requiring potentially disruptive manual calculations or records. This paper summarizes and compares wearable fitness devices, also called "fitness trackers" or "activity trackers." These devices are becoming increasingly popular in personal healthcare, motivating people to exercise more throughout the day without the need for lifestyle changes. The various choices in the market for wearable devices are also increasing, with customers searching for products that best suit their personal needs. Further, using a wearable device or fitness tracker can help people reach a fitness goal or finish line. Generally, companies display advertising for these kinds of products and depict them as beneficial, user friendly, and accurate. However, there are no objective research results to prove the veracity of their words. This research features subjective and objective experimental results, which reveal that some devices perform better than others.

Methods: The four most popular wristband style wearable devices currently on the market (Withings Pulse, Misfit Shine, Jawbone Up24, and Fitbit Flex) are selected and compared. The accuracy of fitness tracking is one of the key components for fitness tracking, and some devices perform better than others. This research shows subjective and objective experimental results that are used to compare the accuracy of four wearable devices in conjunction with user friendliness and satisfaction of 7 real users. In addition, this research matches the opinions between reviewers on an Internet site and those of subjects when using the device.

Results: Withings Pulse is the most friendly and satisfactory from the users' viewpoint. It is the most accurate and repeatable for step and distance tracking, which is the most important measurement of fitness tracking, followed by Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine. In contrast, Misfit Shine has the highest score for design and hardware, which is also appreciated by users.

Conclusions: From the results of experiments on four wearable devices, it is determined that the most acceptable in terms of price and satisfaction levels is the Withings Pulse, followed by the Fitbit Flex, Jawbone Up24, and Misfit Shine.

Citing Articles

A new trauma severity scoring system adapted to wearable monitoring: A pilot study.

Lemarquand A, Jannot P, Kammerlocher L, Lissorgues G, Behr M, Arnoux P PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0318290.

PMID: 40036212 PMC: 11878944. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318290.


Facilitators of and Barriers to Teachers' Engagement With Consumer Technologies for Stress Management: Qualitative Study.

Manning J, Blandford A, Edbrooke-Childs J J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e50457.

PMID: 39437381 PMC: 11538882. DOI: 10.2196/50457.


Exploring the Experiences of Community-Dwelling Older Adults on Using Wearable Monitoring Devices With Regular Support From Community Health Workers, Nurses, and Social Workers: Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Wong A, Bayuo J, Su J, Chow K, Wong S, Wong B J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49403.

PMID: 39110493 PMC: 11339583. DOI: 10.2196/49403.


Assessing the Impact of COVID-19 on Amateur Runners' Performance: An Analysis through Monitoring Devices.

Garcia-Arrabe M, Gimenez M, Moriceau J, Fevre A, Roy J, Gonzalez-de-la-Flor A Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(8).

PMID: 38676252 PMC: 11054059. DOI: 10.3390/s24082635.


Attributes, Methods, and Frameworks Used to Evaluate Wearables and Their Companion mHealth Apps: Scoping Review.

Moorthy P, Weinert L, Schuttler C, Svensson L, Sedlmayr B, Muller J JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024; 12:e52179.

PMID: 38578671 PMC: 11031706. DOI: 10.2196/52179.