» Articles » PMID: 27216771

Patient Factors Associated with Non-attendance at Colonoscopy After a Positive Screening Faecal Occult Blood Test

Overview
Journal J Med Screen
Specialty Public Health
Date 2016 May 25
PMID 27216771
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background Screening participants with abnormal faecal occult blood test results who do not attend further testing are at high risk of colorectal cancer, yet little is known about their reasons for non-attendance. Methods We conducted a medical record review of 170 patients from two English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme centres who had abnormal guaiac faecal occult blood test screening tests between November 2011 and April 2013 but did not undergo colonoscopy. Using information from patient records, we coded and categorized reasons for non-attendance. Results Of the 170 patients, 82 were eligible for review, of whom 66 had at least one recorded reason for lack of colonoscopy follow-up. Reasons fell into seven main categories: (i) other commitments, (ii) unwillingness to have the test, (iii) a feeling that the faecal occult blood test result was a false positive, (iv) another health issue taking priority, (v) failing to complete bowel preparation, (vi) practical barriers (e.g. lack of transport), and (vii) having had or planning colonoscopy elsewhere. The most common single reasons were unwillingness to have a colonoscopy and being away. Conclusions We identify a range of apparent reasons for colonoscopy non-attendance after a positive faecal occult blood test screening. Education regarding the interpretation of guaiac faecal occult blood test findings, offer of alternative confirmatory test options, and flexibility in the timing or location of subsequent testing might decrease non-attendance of diagnostic testing following positive faecal occult blood test.

Citing Articles

Provision of colonoscopy in rural settings: A qualitative assessment of provider context, barriers, facilitators, and capacity.

Ramalingam N, Coury J, Barnes C, Kenzie E, Petrik A, Mummadi R J Rural Health. 2023; 40(2):272-281.

PMID: 37676061 PMC: 10918036. DOI: 10.1111/jrh.12793.


Implementation of a home-based colorectal cancer screening intervention in Malaysia (CRC-SIM).

Schliemann D, Ramanathan K, Ibrahim Tamin N, ONeill C, Cardwell C, Ismail R BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):22.

PMID: 36609260 PMC: 9817284. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-10487-6.


Reasons for No Colonoscopy After an Unfavorable Screening Result in Dutch Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Questionnaire.

Bertels L, van Asselt K, van Weert H, Dekker E, Knottnerus B Ann Fam Med. 2022; 20(6):526-534.

PMID: 36443069 PMC: 9705029. DOI: 10.1370/afm.2871.


Improvement of participation rate in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by training general practitioners in motivational interviewing (AmDepCCR).

Aujoulat P, Le Goff D, Dany A, Robaskiewick M, Nousbaum J, Derrienic J Trials. 2022; 23(1):144.

PMID: 35164836 PMC: 8842548. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06056-8.


Colorectal Cancer screening in ambulatory healthcare service clinics in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates in 2015-2016.

Almansoori A, AlZaabi M, Alketbi L BMC Cancer. 2021; 21(1):897.

PMID: 34362343 PMC: 8343888. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08623-9.