» Articles » PMID: 27215981

Effect of Progressive Drought Stress on Growth, Leaf Gas Exchange, and Antioxidant Production in Two Maize Cultivars

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2016 May 25
PMID 27215981
Citations 32
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Drought stress is one of the major environmental factors responsible for reduction in crop productivity. In the present study, responses of two maize cultivars (Rung Nong 35 and Dong Dan 80) were examined to explicate the growth, yield, leaf gas exchange, leaf water contents, osmolyte accumulation, membrane lipid peroxidation, and antioxidant activity under progressive drought stress. Maize cultivars were subjected to varying field capacities (FC) viz., well-watered (80 % FC) and drought-stressed (35 % FC) at 45 days after sowing. The effects of drought stress were analyzed at 5, 10, 15, 20, ad 25 days after drought stress (DAS) imposition. Under prolonged drought stress, Rung Nong 35 exhibited higher reduction in growth and yield as compared to Dong Dan 80. Maize cultivar Dong Dan 80 showed higher leaf relative water content (RWC), free proline, and total carbohydrate accumulation than Run Nong 35. Malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide anion were increased with prolongation of drought stress, with higher rates in cultivar Run Nong 35 than cultivar Dong Dan 80. Higher production of superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), and catalase (CAT) and glutathione reductase (GR) resulted in improved growth and yield in Dong Dan 80. Overall, the cultivar Dong Dan 80 was better able to resist the detrimental effects of progressive drought stress as indicated by better growth and yield due to higher antioxidant enzymes, reduced lipid peroxidation, better accumulation of osmolytes, and maintenance of tissue water contents.

Citing Articles

Enhancement of wheat resistance to dry-hot wind stress during grain filling by 24-epibrassinolide: optimization of hormone balance and improvement of flag leaf photosynthetic performance.

Wang C, Cui H, Jin M, Wang J, Li C, Li Y Front Plant Sci. 2025; 16:1552617.

PMID: 40065789 PMC: 11891222. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1552617.


Inter-subspecies diversity of maize to drought stress with physio-biochemical, enzymatic and molecular responses.

Eskikoy G, Kutlu I PeerJ. 2024; 12:e17931.

PMID: 39184382 PMC: 11345000. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.17931.


Impacts of Drought on Photosynthesis in Major Food Crops and the Related Mechanisms of Plant Responses to Drought.

Qiao M, Hong C, Jiao Y, Hou S, Gao H Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999648 PMC: 11243883. DOI: 10.3390/plants13131808.


Stimulating growth, root quality, and yield of carrots cultivated under full and limited irrigation levels by humic and potassium applications.

Elshamly A, Nassar S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14260.

PMID: 37653028 PMC: 10471757. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41488-5.


Efficacy of Carbon Nanodots and Manganese Ferrite (MnFeO) Nanoparticles in Stimulating Growth and Antioxidant Activity in Drought-Stressed Maize Inbred Lines.

Ilyas M, Park H, Baek Y, Sa K, Kim M, Lee J Plants (Basel). 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37631134 PMC: 10458536. DOI: 10.3390/plants12162922.


References
1.
Smith D, Johnson K . Single-step purification of polypeptides expressed in Escherichia coli as fusions with glutathione S-transferase. Gene. 1988; 67(1):31-40. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90005-4. View

2.
Jiang Y, Huang B . Protein Alterations in Tall Fescue in Response to Drought Stress and Abscisic Acid. Crop Sci. 2002; 42(1):202-207. DOI: 10.2135/cropsci2002.2020. View

3.
Erice G, Louahlia S, Irigoyen J, Sanchez-Diaz M, Avice J . Biomass partitioning, morphology and water status of four alfalfa genotypes submitted to progressive drought and subsequent recovery. J Plant Physiol. 2009; 167(2):114-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2009.07.016. View

4.
Mittler R . Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002; 7(9):405-10. DOI: 10.1016/s1360-1385(02)02312-9. View

5.
Blokhina O, Virolainen E, Fagerstedt K . Antioxidants, oxidative damage and oxygen deprivation stress: a review. Ann Bot. 2003; 91 Spec No:179-94. PMC: 4244988. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcf118. View