» Articles » PMID: 27214521

Do Smear-layer Removal Agents Affect the Push-out Bond Strength of Calcium Silicate-based Endodontic Sealers?

Overview
Journal Int Endod J
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 May 24
PMID 27214521
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the effect of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), 2.25% peracetic acid (PA) or 10% citric acid (CA) on the push-out bond strength of calcium silicate-based endodontic sealers [MTA Fillapex (Angelus, Londrina, Brazil) and Total Fill BC Sealer (FKG, La Chaux-de-Fonds, Switzerland)] to root dentine after different periods of immersion in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). AH Plus (Dentsply DeTrey, Konstaz, Germany) was used as a reference material for comparison.

Methodology: Thirty human maxillary incisors were selected and three 1-mm discs were obtained from the middle third of each root. On the axial surface of each disc, three 0.8-mm-diameter holes were drilled through the dentine. After standardized irrigation, each dentine disc from the same root was treated for smear-layer removal with one of the three tested chelating solutions: EDTA, PA or CA. After that, the holes were dried with paper points and filled with one of the three test root canal sealers. The filled dental slices were further immersed in PBS solution (pH 7.2) for 7 days (T1) or 30 days (T2) at 37 °C, before the push-out assay. Friedman, Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used respectively to estimate the impact of the independent variables (solutions, sealers and period of PBS immersion) on the push-out bond strength. The level for significance was set at α = 5% and data were further subjected to a Bonferroni correction.

Results: Solutions and periods of immersion did not significantly influence the displacement resistance (P = 0.285, and P = 0.104, respectively) of sealers to root dentine. On the other hand, the type of sealer significantly affected the push-out bond strength (P = 0.000). AH Plus was associated with greater resistance to dislodgment compared with Total Fill BC Sealer and MTA Fillapex (P = 0.000). MTA Fillapex resulted in the lowest push-out bond strength (P = 0.000).

Conclusion: The use of different chelating agents did not influence the push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers. Calcium silicate-based sealers had lower push-out bond strength values compared with a conventional epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus).

Citing Articles

Evaluation of the Effect of Chitosan-Based Irrigation Solutions on the Bond Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate to Bulk-Fill Composite.

Sahin Manti A, Helvacioglu Kivanc B J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(12).

PMID: 39728170 PMC: 11677178. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15120370.


Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.

Merfea M, Cimpean S, Chiorean R, Antoniac A, Delean A, Badea I Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(12).

PMID: 39727454 PMC: 11675060. DOI: 10.3390/dj12120397.


Effects of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid, and etidronic acid on root dentin mineral content and bond strength of a bioceramic-based sealer: A scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy study.

Tasan A, Ozlek E J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2024; 18(1):37-43.

PMID: 38881645 PMC: 11179143. DOI: 10.34172/joddd.40798.


Update on chelating agents in endodontic treatment: A systematic review.

Fortea L, Sanz-Serrano D, Luz L, Bardini G, Mercade M J Clin Exp Dent. 2024; 16(4):e516-e538.

PMID: 38725809 PMC: 11078497. DOI: 10.4317/jced.60989.


Dislodgement resistance and structural changes of tricalcium silicate-based cements after exposure to different chelating agents.

Ulusoy O, Ballal N, Narkedamalli R, Ulusoy N, Shetty K, Luke A PLoS One. 2024; 19(1):e0296647.

PMID: 38232127 PMC: 10793889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296647.