» Articles » PMID: 27212744

Efficacy of Ultrasound-guided Mandibular Block in Predicting Safer Anesthetic Induction

Overview
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2016 May 24
PMID 27212744
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Mandibular nerve block reverses the trismus caused by pain and muscle spasm, thereby allowing for selection of a safer intubation technique.

Aims: As ultrasonographic imaging has added newer dimensions to clinical anesthesia practice, we utilized this tool in performing mandibular nerve block and evaluated its efficacy in segregating trismus patients on etiological basis, to predict safer anesthetic induction.

Settings And Design: Prospective, randomized controlled, outcome assessor blinded trial.

Materials And Methods: Sixty-eight patients with unilateral mandibular fracture, acute pain, and trismus were randomized to receive mandibular nerve block by Vazirani-Akinosi approach (Group V) or the ultrasound-guided (USG) technique (Group U) before the general anesthetic induction for corrective surgery. Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score and inter-incisor distance was measured at intervals. Primary outcome measure was blocked failure (continued pain [VAS > 30] after the block procedure).

Statistical Analysis Used: Mann-Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

Results: There was a significant decrease in pain score following the block procedure, except for six patients (block failure) in Group V. Inter-incisor distance increased to near-maximal levels after the nerve blockade, except for nine patients in Group V (including all block failures) and four in Group U having continued limited mouth opening. General anesthetic induction increased the inter-incisor gap in block failures (Group V) only.

Conclusion: USG mandibular block appears to relieve reversible trismus more reliably, thereby allowing for a precise decision on a safer intubation technique.

Citing Articles

A Comparative Study on Sedation Efficacy Between General and Regional Anesthesia with Dexmedetomidine in Patients Under Maxillofacial Surgery.

Yanan J, Hui D, Jianwei G, Ronglin L, Lijuan Z, Jing Z Curr Drug Metab. 2022; 23(11):920-927.

PMID: 35422208 DOI: 10.2174/1389200223666220413113412.


The applications of ultrasound, and ultrasonography in dentistry: a scoping review of the literature.

Elbarbary M, Sgro A, Khazaei S, Goldberg M, Tenenbaum H, Azarpazhooh A Clin Oral Investig. 2022; 26(3):2299-2316.

PMID: 35028733 DOI: 10.1007/s00784-021-04340-6.


Application of ultrasound guidance in the oral and maxillofacial nerve block.

Cao Z, Zhang K, Hu L, Pan J PeerJ. 2021; 9:e12543.

PMID: 34900442 PMC: 8628623. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.12543.


Difficult airway 'made easy' with Vazirani-Akinosi (closed mouth) technique of mandibular nerve block.

Devarakonda B, Issar Y, Goyal R, Vadapalli K Med J Armed Forces India. 2019; 75(2):225-227.

PMID: 31065196 PMC: 6495099. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2018.01.003.

References
1.
Donkor P, Wong J . An evaluation of the closed mouth mandibular block technique. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1990; 19(4):216-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80395-9. View

2.
Martinez Gonzalez J, Benito Pena B, Fernandez Caliz F, San Hipolito Marin L, Penarrocha Diago M . A comparative study of direct mandibular nerve block and the Akinosi technique. Med Oral. 2003; 8(2):143-9. View

3.
Takemura H, Masuda Y, Yatsushiro R, Yamamoto N, Hosoyamada A . Mandibular nerve block treatment for trismus associated with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2002; 27(3):313-5. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2002.30737. View

4.
Meaudre E, Pernod G, Gaillard P, Kaiser E, Cantais E, Ripart J . Mandibular nerve blocks for the removal of dentures during trismus caused by tetanus. Anesth Analg. 2005; 101(1):282-3, table of contents. DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000153501.96734.3F. View

5.
Potocnik I, Bajrovic F . Failure of inferior alveolar nerve block in endodontics. Endod Dent Traumatol. 2000; 15(6):247-51. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1999.tb00782.x. View