Comparison of Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic Approaches for Clinical Stage I and Stage II Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

Overview

Journal Ann Thorac Surg

Publisher Elsevier

Specialties General Surgery
Pulmonary Medicine

Date 2016 May 23

PMID 27209613

Citations 90

Authors

Brian E Louie

Jennifer L Wilson

SungHee Kim

Robert J Cerfolio

Bernard J Park

Alexander S Farivar

Eric Vallieres

Ralph W Aye

William R Burfeind Jr

Mark I Block

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Data from selected centers show that robotic lobectomy is safe and effective and has 30-day mortality comparable to that of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). However, widespread adoption of robotic lobectomy is controversial. We used The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery (STS-GTS) Database to evaluate quality metrics for these 2 minimally invasive lobectomy techniques.

Methods: A database query for primary clinical stage I or stage II non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at high-volume centers from 2009 to 2013 identified 1,220 robotic lobectomies and 12,378 VATS procedures. Quality metrics evaluated included operative morbidity, 30-day mortality, and nodal upstaging, defined as cN0 to pN1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate nodal upstaging.

Results: Patients undergoing robotic lobectomy were older, less active, and less likely to be an ever smoker and had higher body mass index (BMI) (all p < 0.05). They were also more likely to have coronary heart disease or hypertension (all p < 0.001) and to have had preoperative mediastinal staging (p < 0.0001). Robotic lobectomy operative times were longer (median 186 versus 173 minutes; p < 0.001); all other operative measurements were similar. All postoperative outcomes were similar, including complications and 30-day mortality (robotic lobectomy, 0.6% versus VATS, 0.8%; p = 0.4). Median length of stay was 4 days for both, but a higher proportion of patients undergoing robotic lobectomy had hospital stays less than 4 days (48% versus 39%; p < 0.001). Nodal upstaging overall was similar (p = 0.6) but with trends favoring VATS in the cT1b group and robotic lobectomy in the cT2a group.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing robotic lobectomy had more comorbidities and robotic lobectomy operative times were longer, but quality outcome measures, including complications, hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and nodal upstaging, suggest that robotic lobectomy and VATS are equivalent.

Citing Articles

Global trends and hotspots in robotic surgery over the past decade: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.

Song M, Liu Q, Guo H, Wang Z, Zhang H J Robot Surg. 2024; 19(1):33.

PMID: 39729231 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02203-2.

Uniportal Robotic Lobectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Invasive Lung Cancer: A Novel Approach and Perioperative Outcomes.

Lin S, Yu X, Xu Y, Xin Y, He J, Yu Z Thorac Cancer. 2024; 16(1):e15500.

PMID: 39603599 PMC: 11729994. DOI: 10.1111/1759-7714.15500.

Learning curve of consolers and bedside surgeons fused robotic-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy: insights from the initial 100 cases.

Uno Y, Tane S, Tanaka Y, Takanashi M, Doi T, Ogawa H Surg Today. 2024; .

PMID: 39540928 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-024-02957-0.

Initial Experience of Single-Port Robotic Lobectomy for Large-Sized Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Lee J, Gu B, Yong H, Hwang S, Kim H Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272949 PMC: 11394038. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173091.

The Surgical Renaissance: Advancements in Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery and Their Impact on Patient Outcomes.

Pan J, Watkins A, Stock C, Moffatt-Bruce S, Servais E Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(17).

PMID: 39272946 PMC: 11393871. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173086.

References

Paul S, Altorki N, Sheng S, Lee P, Harpole D, Onaitis M . Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139(2):366-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.08.026. View

Yim A, Wan S, Lee T, Arifi A . VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70(1):243-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01258-3. View

Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, Strother E, Najam F . Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009; 88(2):380-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.039. View

Ye X, Xie L, Chen G, Tang J, Ben X . Robotic thoracic surgery versus video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015; 21(4):409-14. DOI: 10.1093/icvts/ivv155. View

Cao C, Zhu Z, Yan T, Wang Q, Jiang G, Liu L . Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open thoracotomy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score analysis based on a multi-institutional registry. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013; 44(5):849-54. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezt406. View

Swanson S, Miller D, McKenna Jr R, Howington J, Marshall M, Yoo A . Comparing robot-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy with conventional video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy and wedge resection: results from a multihospital database (Premier). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 147(3):929-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.09.046. View

Jang H, Lee H, Park S, Zo J . Comparison of the early robot-assisted lobectomy experience to video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for lung cancer: a single-institution case series matching study. Innovations (Phila). 2012; 6(5):305-10. DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182378b4c. View

Nakata M, Saeki H, Yokoyama N, Kurita A, Takiyama W, Takashima S . Pulmonary function after lobectomy: video-assisted thoracic surgery versus thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000; 70(3):938-41. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(00)01513-7. View

Cerfolio R, Bryant A, Skylizard L, Minnich D . Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 142(4):740-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.07.022. View

10.

Dylewski M, Ohaeto A, Pereira J . Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011; 23(1):36-42. DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2011.01.005. View

11.

Deen S, Wilson J, Wilshire C, Vallieres E, Farivar A, Aye R . Defining the cost of care for lobectomy and segmentectomy: a comparison of open, video-assisted thoracoscopic, and robotic approaches. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014; 97(3):1000-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.11.021. View

12.

Lee J, Cho B, Bae M, Lee C, Park I, Kim D . Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with superior compliance with adjuvant chemotherapy in lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 91(2):344-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.09.031. View

13.

Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S . Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 97(1):236-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117. View

14.

Boffa D, Kosinski A, Paul S, Mitchell J, Onaitis M . Lymph node evaluation by open or video-assisted approaches in 11,500 anatomic lung cancer resections. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 94(2):347-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.04.059. View

15.

Veronesi G, Agoglia B, Melfi F, Maisonneuve P, Bertolotti R, Bianchi P . Experience with robotic lobectomy for lung cancer. Innovations (Phila). 2012; 6(6):355-60. DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0b013e3182490093. View

16.

Licht P, Jorgensen O, Ladegaard L, Jakobsen E . A national study of nodal upstaging after thoracoscopic versus open lobectomy for clinical stage I lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013; 96(3):943-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.011. View

17.

Farivar A, Cerfolio R, Vallieres E, Knight A, Bryant A, Lingala V . Comparing robotic lung resection with thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases entered into the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database. Innovations (Phila). 2014; 9(1):10-5. DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000043. View

18.

Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P, Melfi F, Schmid R, Borri A . Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009; 140(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.10.025. View

19.

Louie B, Farivar A, Aye R, Vallieres E . Early experience with robotic lung resection results in similar operative outcomes and morbidity when compared with matched video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery cases. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93(5):1598-604. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.01.067. View

20.

Gopaldas R, Bakaeen F, Dao T, Walsh G, Swisher S, Chu D . Video-assisted thoracoscopic versus open thoracotomy lobectomy in a cohort of 13,619 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89(5):1563-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.026. View