Is Antenatal RhIg Completely Safe?
Overview
Overview
Journal
Rev Bras Hematol Hemoter
Publisher
Elsevier
Specialty
Hematology
Date
2016 May 22
PMID
27208576
Authors
Affiliations
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
References
1.
Dillon A, Chaudhari T, Crispin P, Shadbolt B, Kent A
. Has anti-D prophylaxis increased the rate of positive direct antiglobulin test results and can the direct antiglobulin test predict need for phototherapy in Rh/ABO incompatibility?. J Paediatr Child Health. 2010; 47(1-2):40-3.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2010.01888.x.
View
2.
Cohen D, Johnson M, Liang W, McDaniel H, Young P
. Clinically significant hemolytic disease of the newborn secondary to passive transfer of anti-D from maternal RhIG. Transfusion. 2014; 54(11):2863-6.
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12698.
View
3.
Maayan-Metzger A, Schwartz T, Sulkes J, Merlob P
. Maternal anti-D prophylaxis during pregnancy does not cause neonatal haemolysis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000; 84(1):F60-2.
PMC: 1721201.
DOI: 10.1136/fn.84.1.f60.
View
4.
Tovey L, Townley A, Stevenson B, Taverner J
. The Yorkshire antenatal anti-D immunoglobulin trial in primigravidae. Lancet. 1983; 2(8344):244-6.
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(83)90232-5.
View
5.
Watchko J, Triulzi D
. Need to clarify the cause of hemolysis in case report of newborn with clinically significant hemolytic disease and passive transfer of anti-D from maternal RhIG. Transfusion. 2014; 54(11):3017-8.
DOI: 10.1111/trf.12858.
View