» Articles » PMID: 27199520

Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Cervical Cancer: Background Including Evidence-based Data, Pitfalls of the Data, Limitation of Treatment in Certain Groups

Overview
Specialty Oncology
Date 2016 May 21
PMID 27199520
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is regarded as the standard treatment for locally advanced uterine cervical cancer (LACC), including stage Ib2-IVa disease [International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging]. However, approximately a third of eligible patients in previous studies died of LACC despite receiving CCRT. The therapeutic significance of CCRT alone in stage III-IVa disease has not yet been confirmed. Effective treatment of some LACC is beyond the scope of CCRT. The objective of the present review is to highlight some challenging work aimed at overcoming this seemingly intractable disease. CCRT with increased peak concentrations of cisplatin (CDDP), surgery following CCRT, adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) following CCRT, and neoadjuvant CT followed by CCRT are strategies expected to enhance the therapeutic efficacy of CCRT. If patients with LACC were divided into those with low-risk or high-risk systemic disease or prognoses, novel strategies should be assessed in the group with high-risk disease.

Citing Articles

Study of alloferon, a novel immunomodulatory antimicrobial peptide (AMP), and its analogues.

Appiah C, Chen S, Pori A, Retyunskiy V, Tzeng C, Zhao Y Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1359261.

PMID: 38434708 PMC: 10904621. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1359261.


The potential of PCNA inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in cervical cancer.

Wendel S, Snow J, Gu L, Banerjee N, Malkas L, Wallace N J Med Virol. 2023; 95(11):e29244.

PMID: 38010649 PMC: 10683864. DOI: 10.1002/jmv.29244.


The relationship between the radiation dose of pelvic-bone marrow and lymphocytic toxicity in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer.

Zhang B, Li Y, Xu L, Chai Y, Qu C, Cao Y Radiat Oncol. 2023; 18(1):12.

PMID: 36658595 PMC: 9854027. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02205-8.


Nimotuzumab combined with chemoradiotherapy for the treatment of cervical cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yuan Y, Chen J, Fang M, Guo Y, Sun X, Yu D Front Oncol. 2022; 12:994726.

PMID: 36263226 PMC: 9573994. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.994726.


Efficacy and safety of endostar combined with chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maimaitiming N, Ma X, Wei Y, Cao L, Gao Y, Zhang L Medicine (Baltimore). 2022; 101(36):e30170.

PMID: 36086700 PMC: 10980378. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030170.


References
1.
Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Zhao P, Zeng H, Zou X . Annual report on status of cancer in China, 2010. Chin J Cancer Res. 2014; 26(1):48-58. PMC: 3937758. DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.1000-9604.2014.01.08. View

2.
Ryu S, Lee W, Kim K, Park S, Kim B, Kim M . Randomized clinical trial of weekly vs. triweekly cisplatin-based chemotherapy concurrent with radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81(4):e577-81. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.05.002. View

3.
Eifel P, Winter K, Morris M, Levenback C, Grigsby P, Cooper J . Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of radiation therapy oncology group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol. 2004; 22(5):872-80. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.07.197. View

4.
McCormack M, Kadalayil L, Hackshaw A, Hall-Craggs M, Symonds R, Warwick V . A phase II study of weekly neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Br J Cancer. 2013; 108(12):2464-9. PMC: 3694233. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.230. View

5.
Houvenaeghel G, Lelievre L, Gonzague-Casabianca L, Buttarelli M, Moutardier V, Goncalves A . Long-term survival after concomitant chemoradiotherapy prior to surgery in advanced cervical carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2005; 100(2):338-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.047. View