» Articles » PMID: 27196121

Intranasal Dexmedetomidine As a Sedative Premedication for Patients Undergoing Suspension Laryngoscopy: A Randomized Double-Blind Study

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2016 May 20
PMID 27196121
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Intranasal dexmedetomidine, a well-tolerated and convenient treatment option, has been shown to induce a favorable perioperative anxiolysis in children. We investigate intranasal dexmedetomidine as a sedative premedication for anesthesia recovery in an adult population.

Methods: A prospective randomized controlled trial; 81 adult patients scheduled for elective suspension laryngoscopy received intranasal dexmedetomidine (1 μg∙kg-1) or a placebo 45-60 min before anesthetic induction. Extubation time was used as the primary outcome measure. Secondary variables included the levels of sedation (Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation scale, OAA/S) and anxiety (4-point anxiety score), anesthetic and analgesic requirements, hemodynamic fluctuations, and anesthesia recovery as well as side effects.

Results: The levels of sedation and anxiety differed significantly between the two groups at anesthesia pre-induction (p < 0.001 and = 0.001, respectively). Repeated-measure general linear model determined no significant interaction effect between group and time on the targeted concentration of propofol (F = 1.635, p = 0.200), but a significant main effect of group existed (F = 6.880, p = 0.010). A moderate but significant decrease in the heart rate was recorded in the dexmedetomidine group at pre-induction. Episodes of tachycardia and hypertension after tracheal intubation and extubation were more frequent in the placebo group.

Conclusions: Intranasal dexmedetomidine as a sedative premedication induced a favorable perioperative anxiolysis without prolongation in anesthesia recovery; the hemodynamic effect was modest.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 02108171.

Citing Articles

Effects of Intranasal and Intravenous Dexmedetomidine on Hemodynamic Responses to Tracheal Intubation and Skull Pin Holder Fixation: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial.

Singh G, Lnu H, Verma R, Shukla A, Singh P, Kohli M Cureus. 2025; 17(1):e76980.

PMID: 39912047 PMC: 11795000. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.76980.


Dexmedetomidine Nasal Spray on Emergence Agitation After Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgery: Protocol for a Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial.

Wang D, Hu J, Shi H, Zhuang M, Dou W, Ji F Int J Gen Med. 2024; 17:4991-4998.

PMID: 39497729 PMC: 11533171. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S490244.


Nebulized Versus Intravenously Administered Dexmedetomidine for Obtunding Hemodynamic Responses to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation: A Randomized Double-Blind Comparative Study.

Singla A, Saraswat R, Bharadwaj A, Singh S Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54768.

PMID: 38524064 PMC: 10961112. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54768.


Nebulized dexmedetomidine for attenuating hemodynamic response to laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation in adult patients undergoing surgeries under general anaesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Gupta M, Rohilla R, Gupta P, Tamilchelvan H, Joshi U, Kanwat J BMC Anesthesiol. 2023; 23(1):406.

PMID: 38082217 PMC: 10712167. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-023-02366-9.


The Effect of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Emergence Delirium Prevention in Pediatric Ambulatory Dental Rehabilitation Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

He H, Cui Q, Chen H, Huang X, Wang S, Yu T Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023; 17:3563-3570.

PMID: 38054181 PMC: 10695126. DOI: 10.2147/DDDT.S427291.


References
1.
Yuen V, Irwin M, Hui T, Yuen M, Lee L . A double-blind, crossover assessment of the sedative and analgesic effects of intranasal dexmedetomidine. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105(2):374-80. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000269488.06546.7c. View

2.
Akin A, Bayram A, Esmaoglu A, Tosun Z, Aksu R, Altuntas R . Dexmedetomidine vs midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients undergoing anesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012; 22(9):871-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03802.x. View

3.
Zeyneloglu P, Pirat A, Candan S, Kuyumcu S, Tekin I, Arslan G . Dexmedetomidine causes prolonged recovery when compared with midazolam/fentanyl combination in outpatient shock wave lithotripsy. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2008; 25(12):961-7. DOI: 10.1017/S0265021508004699. View

4.
Caumo W, Hidalgo M, Schmidt A, Iwamoto C, Adamatti L, Bergmann J . Effect of pre-operative anxiolysis on postoperative pain response in patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy. Anaesthesia. 2002; 57(8):740-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.2002.02690.x. View

5.
Nooh N, Sheta S, Abdullah W, Abdelhalim A . Intranasal atomized dexmedetomidine for sedation during third molar extraction. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 42(7):857-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2013.02.003. View