» Articles » PMID: 27192358

Human Fecal and Pathogen Exposure Pathways in Rural Indian Villages and the Effect of Increased Latrine Coverage

Overview
Journal Water Res
Date 2016 May 19
PMID 27192358
Citations 45
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Efforts to eradicate open defecation and improve sanitation access are unlikely to achieve health benefits unless interventions reduce microbial exposures. This study assessed human fecal contamination and pathogen exposures in rural India, and the effect of increased sanitation coverage on contamination and exposure rates. In a cross-sectional study of 60 villages of a cluster-randomized controlled sanitation trial in Odisha, India, human and domestic animal fecal contamination was measured in community tubewells and ponds (n = 301) and via exposure pathways in homes (n = 354), using Bacteroidales microbial source tracking fecal markers validated in India. Community water sources were further tested for diarrheal pathogens (rotavirus, adenovirus and Vibrio cholerae by quantitative PCR; pathogenic Escherichia coli by multiplex PCR; Cryptosporidium and Giardia by immunomagnetic separation and direct fluorescent antibody microscopy). Exposure pathways in intervention and control villages were compared and relationships with child diarrhea examined. Human fecal markers were rarely detected in tubewells (2.4%, 95%CI: 0.3-4.5%) and ponds (5.6%, 95%CI: 0.8-10.3%), compared to homes (35.4%, 95%CI: 30.4-40.4%). In tubewells, V. cholerae was the most frequently detected pathogen (19.8%, 95%CI: 14.4-25.2%), followed by Giardia (14.8%, 95%CI: 10.0-19.7%). In ponds, Giardia was most often detected (74.5%, 95%CI: 65.7-83.3%), followed by pathogenic E. coli (48.1%, 95%CI: 34.8-61.5%) and rotavirus (44.4%, 95%CI: 34.2-54.7%). At village-level, prevalence of fecal pathogen detection in community drinking water sources was associated with elevated prevalence of child diarrhea within 6 weeks of testing (RR 2.13, 95%CI: 1.25-3.63) while within homes, higher levels of human and animal fecal marker detection were associated with increased risks of subsequent child diarrhea (P = 0.044 and 0.013, respectively). There was no evidence that the intervention, which increased functional latrine coverage and use by 27 percentage points, reduced human fecal contamination in any tested pathway, nor the prevalence of pathogens in water sources. In conclusion, the study demonstrates that (1) improved sanitation alone may be insufficient and further interventions needed in the domestic domain to reduce widespread human and animal fecal contamination observed in homes, (2) pathogens detected in tubewells indicate these sources are microbiologically unsafe for drinking and were associated with child diarrhea, (3) domestic use of ponds heavily contaminated with multiple pathogens presents an under-recognized health risk, and (4) a 27 percentage point increase in improved sanitation access at village-level did not reduce detectable human fecal and pathogen contamination in this setting.

Citing Articles

Exposure behaviour to Escherichia coli among households in Imvepi refugee settlement, Terego district Uganda.

Nalugya A, Ssempebwa J, Muleme J, Wafula S, Tamale B, Tigaiza A BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2041.

PMID: 39080627 PMC: 11290189. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19525-3.


Addressing Fecal Contamination in Rural Kenyan Households: The Roles of Environmental Interventions and Animal Ownership.

Swarthout J, Mureithi M, Mboya J, Arnold B, Wolfe M, Dentz H Environ Sci Technol. 2024; 58(22):9500-9514.

PMID: 38760010 PMC: 11155254. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.3c09419.


Assessing the Influence of Hand-Dug Well Features and Management on Water Quality.

Gnimadi C, Gawou K, Aboah M, Owiredu E, Adusei-Gyamfi J Environ Health Insights. 2024; 18:11786302241249844.

PMID: 38751904 PMC: 11095203. DOI: 10.1177/11786302241249844.


Is detection of enteropathogens and human or animal faecal markers in the environment associated with subsequent child enteric infections and growth: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

Mertens A, Arnold B, Benjamin-Chung J, Boehm A, Brown J, Capone D Lancet Glob Health. 2024; 12(3):e433-e444.

PMID: 38365415 PMC: 10882208. DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00563-6.


Health effects and externalities of the popularization of sanitary toilets: evidence from Rural China.

Gu Y, Zhou W, Zheng T, Huang F BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):2225.

PMID: 37951864 PMC: 10640730. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17192-4.


References
1.
Schriewer A, Odagiri M, Wuertz S, Misra P, Panigrahi P, Clasen T . Human and Animal Fecal Contamination of Community Water Sources, Stored Drinking Water and Hands in Rural India Measured with Validated Microbial Source Tracking Assays. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015; 93(3):509-516. PMC: 4559688. DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0824. View

2.
Boisson S, Sosai P, Ray S, Routray P, Torondel B, Schmidt W . Promoting latrine construction and use in rural villages practicing open defecation: process evaluation in connection with a randomised controlled trial in Orissa, India. BMC Res Notes. 2014; 7:486. PMC: 4236737. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-486. View

3.
Pickering A, Julian T, Mamuya S, Boehm A, Davis J . Bacterial hand contamination among Tanzanian mothers varies temporally and following household activities. Trop Med Int Health. 2010; 16(2):233-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2010.02677.x. View

4.
Liu L, Johnson H, Cousens S, Perin J, Scott S, Lawn J . Global, regional, and national causes of child mortality: an updated systematic analysis for 2010 with time trends since 2000. Lancet. 2012; 379(9832):2151-61. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60560-1. View

5.
Bain R, Cronk R, Hossain R, Bonjour S, Onda K, Wright J . Global assessment of exposure to faecal contamination through drinking water based on a systematic review. Trop Med Int Health. 2014; 19(8):917-27. PMC: 4255778. DOI: 10.1111/tmi.12334. View