» Articles » PMID: 27188340

Prediction of Post-Concussive Behavioral Changes in a Rodent Model Based on Head Rotational Acceleration Characteristics

Overview
Journal Ann Biomed Eng
Date 2016 May 19
PMID 27188340
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Quantifying injury tolerance for concussion is complicated by variability in the type, severity, and time course of post-injury physiological and behavioral changes. The current study outlined acute and chronic changes in behavioral metrics following rotational acceleration-induced concussion in rats. The Medical College of Wisconsin (MCW) rotational injury model independently controlled magnitude and duration of the rotational acceleration pulse. Increasing rotational acceleration magnitude produced longer recovery times, which were used in this study and our prior work as an assessment of acute injury severity. However, longer duration rotational accelerations produced changes in emotionality as measured using the elevated plus maze. Cognitive deficits were for the most part not apparent in the Morris water maze assessment, possibly due to the lower severity of rotational acceleration pulses incorporated in this study. Changes in emotionality evolved between acute and chronic assessments, in some cases increasing in severity and in others reversing polarity. These findings highlight the complexity of quantifying injury tolerance for concussion and demonstrate a need to incorporate rotational acceleration magnitude and duration in proposed injury tolerance metrics. Rotational velocity on its own was not a strong predictor of the magnitude or type of acute behavioral changes following concussion, although its combination with rotational acceleration magnitude using multivariate analysis was the strongest predictor for acute recovery time and some chronic emotional-type behavioral changes.

Citing Articles

What Happens in TBI? A Wide Talk on Animal Models and Future Perspective.

Kundu S, Singh S Curr Neuropharmacol. 2022; 21(5):1139-1164.

PMID: 35794772 PMC: 10286592. DOI: 10.2174/1570159X20666220706094248.


A Preclinical Rodent Model for Repetitive Subconcussive Head Impact Exposure in Contact Sport Athletes.

Stemper B, Shah A, Chiariello R, McCarthy C, Jessen K, Sarka B Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:805124.

PMID: 35368301 PMC: 8965565. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.805124.


Orientation of neurites influences severity of mechanically induced tau pathology.

Braun N, Liao D, Alford P Biophys J. 2021; 120(16):3272-3282.

PMID: 34293301 PMC: 8392125. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.07.011.


A Systematic Review of Closed Head Injury Models of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury in Mice and Rats.

Bodnar C, Roberts K, Higgins E, Bachstetter A J Neurotrauma. 2019; 36(11):1683-1706.

PMID: 30661454 PMC: 6555186. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2018.6127.


The Controlled Cortical Impact Model: Applications, Considerations for Researchers, and Future Directions.

Osier N, Dixon C Front Neurol. 2016; 7:134.

PMID: 27582726 PMC: 4987613. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00134.

References
1.
Brolinson P, Manoogian S, McNeely D, Goforth M, Greenwald R, Duma S . Analysis of linear head accelerations from collegiate football impacts. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2006; 5(1):23-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.csmr.0000306515.87053.fa. View

2.
Jones N, Cardamone L, Williams J, Salzberg M, Myers D, OBrien T . Experimental traumatic brain injury induces a pervasive hyperanxious phenotype in rats. J Neurotrauma. 2008; 25(11):1367-74. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2008.0641. View

3.
Stemper B, Storvik S . Incorporation of lower neck shear forces to predict facet joint injury risk in low-speed automotive rear impacts. Traffic Inj Prev. 2010; 11(3):300-8. DOI: 10.1080/15389580903581684. View

4.
Fijalkowski R, Stemper B, Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Crowe M, Gennarelli T . New rat model for diffuse brain injury using coronal plane angular acceleration. J Neurotrauma. 2007; 24(8):1387-98. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2007.0268. View

5.
Takhounts E, Craig M, Moorhouse K, McFadden J, Hasija V . Development of brain injury criteria (BrIC). Stapp Car Crash J. 2014; 57:243-66. DOI: 10.4271/2013-22-0010. View