» Articles » PMID: 27186054

Intensive Care in India: The Indian Intensive Care Case Mix and Practice Patterns Study

Abstract

Aims: To obtain information on organizational aspects, case mix and practices in Indian Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

Patients And Methods: An observational, 4-day point prevalence study was performed between 2010 and 2011 in 4209 patients from 124 ICUs. ICU and patient characteristics, and interventions were recorded for 24 h of the study day, and outcomes till 30 days after the study day. Data were analyzed for 4038 adult patients from 120 ICUs.

Results: On the study day, mean age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) scores were 54.1 ± 17.1 years, 17.4 ± 9.2 and 3.8 ± 3.6, respectively. About 46.4% patients had ≥1 organ failure. Nearly, 37% and 22.2% patients received mechanical ventilation (MV) and vasopressors or inotropes, respectively. Nearly, 12.2% patients developed an infection in the ICU. About 28.3% patients had severe sepsis or septic shock (SvSpSS) during their ICU stay. About 60.7% patients without infection received antibiotics. There were 546 deaths and 183 terminal discharges (TDs) from ICU (including left against medical advice or discharged on request), with ICU mortality 729/4038 (18.1%). In 1627 patients admitted within 24 h of the study day, the standardized mortality ratio was 0.67. The APACHE II and SOFA scores, public hospital ICUs, medical ICUs, inadequately equipped ICUs, medical admission, self-paying patient, presence of SvSpSS, acute respiratory failure or cancer, need for a fluid bolus, and MV were independent predictors of mortality.

Conclusions: The high proportion of TDs and the association of public hospitals, self-paying patients, and inadequately equipped hospitals with mortality has important implications for critical care in India.

Citing Articles

Salt Based or BaLanced SolUtion-Trends Existing in Indian Intensive Care Units: A Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study (SOLUTE Study).

Gupta S, Dixit S, Tomar D, Zirpe K, Govil D, Choudhry D Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025; 28(11):1028-1037.

PMID: 39882048 PMC: 11773594. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24825.


Prediction of mortality in sepsis patients using stacked ensemble machine learning algorithm.

Babu M, Sappani M, Joy M, Chandiraseharan V, Jeyaseelan L, Sudarsanam T J Postgrad Med. 2024; 70(4):209-216.

PMID: 39641373 PMC: 11722707. DOI: 10.4103/jpgm.jpgm_357_24.


Family satisfaction with care provided to patients deceased in intensive care unit.

Sharieff S, Sajjal A, Idrees A, Rafai W Pak J Med Sci. 2024; 40(10):2441-2446.

PMID: 39554656 PMC: 11568704. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.40.10.8697.


Unraveling Sepsis Epidemiology in a Low- and Middle-Income Intensive Care Setting Reveals the Alarming Burden of Tropical Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance: A Prospective Observational Study (MARS-India).

Virk H, Biemond J, Earny V, Chowdhury S, Frolke R, Khanna S Clin Infect Dis. 2024; 80(1):101-107.

PMID: 39352692 PMC: 11797389. DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciae486.


Application of center for disease control and prevention standardized antimicrobial administration ratio to an Indian hospital.

Sarma S, Borde K, Robinson M, Rawat N, Khurana P, Singh V Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024; 4(1):e149.

PMID: 39350946 PMC: 11440567. DOI: 10.1017/ash.2024.396.


References
1.
Checkley W, Martin G, Brown S, Chang S, Dabbagh O, Fremont R . Structure, process, and annual ICU mortality across 69 centers: United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study. Crit Care Med. 2013; 42(2):344-56. PMC: 4035482. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182a275d7. View

2.
Barnett V, Aurora V . Physician beliefs and practice regarding end-of-life care in India. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2009; 12(3):109-15. PMC: 2738312. DOI: 10.4103/0972-5229.43679. View

3.
Sevransky J, Checkley W, Herrera P, Pickering B, Barr J, Brown S . Protocols and Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(10):2076-84. PMC: 5673100. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001157. View

4.
Weled B, Adzhigirey L, Hodgman T, Brilli R, Spevetz A, Kline A . Critical Care Delivery: The Importance of Process of Care and ICU Structure to Improved Outcomes: An Update From the American College of Critical Care Medicine Task Force on Models of Critical Care. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(7):1520-5. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000978. View

5.
Wilcox M, Chong C, Niven D, Rubenfeld G, Rowan K, Wunsch H . Do intensivist staffing patterns influence hospital mortality following ICU admission? A systematic review and meta-analyses. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(10):2253-74. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318292313a. View