» Articles » PMID: 27184486

Bortezomib-based Induction Improves Progression-free Survival of Myeloma Patients Harboring 17p Deletion And/or T(4;14) and Overcomes Their Adverse Prognosis

Overview
Journal Ann Hematol
Specialty Hematology
Date 2016 May 18
PMID 27184486
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Providing a risk-adapted treatment strategy has been a key goal in the ongoing research efforts aimed at providing treatment tailored to the individual genetic make-up. Eighty myeloma patients have been tested for presence of 17p deletion and/or t(4;14) by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Based on FISH results, they have been categorized into patients lacking them (standard risk) and those harboring them (high risk). Patients in each category were randomly assigned 1:1 to induction treatment by either vincristine, adriamycin and dexamethasone (VAD), or bortezomib and dexamethasone (VD) followed by autologous stem cell transplantation and thalidomide maintenance and were followed up for 32 months. 32.5 % of patients were high risk. Following induction, there were significantly higher rates of at least very good partial response achievement in VD arms in standard- and high-risk patients. Regarding complete response achievement, there were insignificant differences between VAD and VD arms in standard and high-risk patients. After a median follow-up of 17.5 months, there was insignificant difference in overall survival (OS) between VAD and VD arms in standard and high-risk patients. There was superior progression-free survival (PFS) in VD arms in standard- and high-risk patients. Among patients who received VD, those belonging to standard and high-risk groups had similar PFS. In conclusion, bortezomib-based induction is superior to non-bortezomib-based one in patients harboring 17p deletion and/or t(4;14) in terms of improving PFS but not OS. Also, it reduces progression risk in patients harboring these high risk cytogenetics.

Citing Articles

A new prognostic scoring system for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the era of new drugs.

Li Y, Liu J, Deng J, Jian Y, Zhang Z, Zhou H Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1473034.

PMID: 39502644 PMC: 11536264. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1473034.


Exploring the Impact of Cytogenetic Abnormalities on Treatment Responses and Survival Outcomes in Multiple Myeloma: A Single-Centre Experience of 13 Years of Follow-Up.

Kazgi M, Bayram E, Koseci T, Mete B, Toyran T, Ergin M Biomedicines. 2024; 12(5).

PMID: 38790976 PMC: 11117921. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12051014.


Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Patients with Multiple Myeloma with Translocation (4;14): The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience.

Pasvolsky O, Gaballa M, Milton D, Masood A, Sami S, Tanner M Transplant Cell Ther. 2023; 29(4):260.e1-260.e6.

PMID: 36646323 PMC: 10040427. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtct.2023.01.010.


Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation.

Dash A, Zhang J, Shen L, Li B, Berg D, Lin J Eur J Haematol. 2020; 105(3):274-285.

PMID: 32350909 PMC: 7497066. DOI: 10.1111/ejh.13435.


High expression of nucleoporin 133 mRNA in bone marrow CD138+ cells is a poor prognostic factor in multiple myeloma.

Ibata S, Kobune M, Kikuchi S, Yoshida M, Miura S, Horiguchi H Oncotarget. 2018; 9(38):25127-25135.

PMID: 29861858 PMC: 5982762. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25350.