» Articles » PMID: 27183068

Long-Term Survival Rates of Titanium Implants Placed in Expanded Alveolar Ridges Using Split Crest Procedures: A Systematic Review

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2016 May 17
PMID 27183068
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the survival rates of titanium dental implants placed using split crest procedures for alveolar ridge expansion.

Materials And Methods: The MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and OpenGrey databases were searched up to January 2015 for studies assessing implants that had been placed in areas submitted to split crest procedures. Two methodologic quality-assessment tools were used based on the type of study. For randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. For the observational studies, an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used.

Results: A total of 1,178 patients received 3,033 implants with ridge expansion. On average, the success rate was 96.6% and the survival rate was 96.8%, with a mean follow-up of 58.3 months. Six of the nine included studies used a bone substitute associated or not with a membrane, and seven studies used an implant in both the maxilla and mandible. In addition, half of the observational studies were considered to be of medium quality, whereas the others were considered to be of low quality; the sole RCT included was classified as having a high risk of bias.

Conclusion: The use of split crest techniques appears to provide predictable alveolar ridge augmentation as well as high survival rates in the short and long term for implants placed in the maxilla or mandible. Patients must be selected with caution.

Citing Articles

Comparison of temperature changes in different irrigation methods used in guided piezosurgery: in vitro study.

Alevizakos V, Mitov G, Schiller M, Bergmann A, Theis L, von See C Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2023; 28(2):653-658.

PMID: 37823966 DOI: 10.1007/s10006-023-01183-1.


Mandibular Alveolar Ridge Split With Simultaneous Implant Placement: A Case Report.

Pandey K, Kherdekar R, Advani H, Dixit S, Dixit A Cureus. 2022; 14(11):e31156.

PMID: 36483892 PMC: 9724452. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.31156.


Ridge augmentation-The new field of computerized guided surgery: A technical note for minimal-invasive bone splitting.

Alevizakos V, Mitov G, Schiller M, von See C Clin Case Rep. 2021; 9(4):2390-2396.

PMID: 33936701 PMC: 8077347. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.4046.


Immediate implant placement in combination with platelet rich-fibrin into extraction sites with periapical infection in the esthetic zone: A case report and review of literature.

Fang J, Xin X, Li W, Wang H, Lv H, Zhou Y World J Clin Cases. 2021; 9(4):960-969.

PMID: 33585645 PMC: 7852644. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i4.960.


Customized Borosilicate Bioglass Scaffolds With Excellent Biodegradation and Osteogenesis for Mandible Reconstruction.

Zhang P, Yang K, Zhou Z, Zhu X, Li W, Cao C Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021; 8:610284.

PMID: 33392173 PMC: 7775478. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.610284.