» Articles » PMID: 27179667

Biodiesel from Soybean Promotes Cell Proliferation in Vitro

Overview
Specialty Toxicology
Date 2016 May 16
PMID 27179667
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Toxicological responses of exhaust emissions of biodiesel are different due to variation in methods of generation and the tested biological models. A chemical profile was generated using ICP-MS and GC-MS for the biodiesel samples obtained in Brazil. A cytotoxicity assay and cytokine secretion experiments were evaluated in human bronchial epithelial cells (BEAS-2B). Cells were exposed to polar (acetone) and nonpolar (hexane) extracts from particles obtained from fuel exhaust: fossil diesel (B5), pure soybean biodiesel (B100), soybean biodiesel with additive (B100A) and ethanol additive (EtOH). Biodiesel and its additives exhibited higher organic and inorganic constituents on particles when compared to B5. The biodiesel extracts did not exert any toxic effect at concentrations 10, 25, 50, 75, and 100μgmL(-1). In fact quite the opposite, a cell proliferation effect induced by the B100 and B100A extracts is reported. A small increase in concentrations of inflammatory mediators (Interleukin-6, IL-6; and Interleukin-8, IL-8) in the medium of biodiesel-treated cells was observed, however, no statistical difference was found. An interesting finding indicates that the presence of metals in the nonpolar (hexane) fraction of biodiesel fuel (B100) represses cytokine release in lung cells. This was revealed by the use of the metal chelator. Results suggest that metals associated with biodiesel's organic constituents might play a significant role in molecular mechanisms associated to cellular proliferation and immune responses.

Citing Articles

Respiratory Health Effects of In Vivo Sub-Chronic Diesel and Biodiesel Exhaust Exposure.

Landwehr K, Mead-Hunter R, OLeary R, Kicic A, Mullins B, Larcombe A Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(6).

PMID: 36982203 PMC: 10049281. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065130.


Bioremediation of cooking oil waste using lipases from wastes.

Okino-Delgado C, Prado D, Facanali R, Marques M, Nascimento A, Fernandes C PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0186246.

PMID: 29073166 PMC: 5657992. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186246.

References
1.
Diociaiuti M, Balduzzi M, De Berardis B, Cattani G, STACCHINI G, Ziemacki G . The two PM(2.5) (fine) and PM(2.5-10) (coarse) fractions: evidence of different biological activity. Environ Res. 2001; 86(3):254-62. DOI: 10.1006/enrs.2001.4275. View

2.
Becker S, Fenton M, Soukup J . Involvement of microbial components and toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in cytokine responses to air pollution particles. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2002; 27(5):611-8. DOI: 10.1165/rcmb.4868. View

3.
Mueller-Anneling L, Avol E, Peters J, Thorne P . Ambient endotoxin concentrations in PM10 from Southern California. Environ Health Perspect. 2004; 112(5):583-8. PMC: 1241925. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6552. View

4.
Farkas E, Batka D, Kremper G, Pocsi I . Structure-based differences between the metal ion selectivity of two siderophores desferrioxamine B (DFB) and desferricoprogen (DFC): why DFC is much better Pb(II) sequestering agent than DFB?. J Inorg Biochem. 2008; 102(8):1654-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2008.03.006. View

5.
Barnes P . The cytokine network in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 2008; 118(11):3546-56. PMC: 2575722. DOI: 10.1172/JCI36130. View