MR Characterization of Adrenal Masses: Field Strength and Pulse Sequence Considerations
Authors
Affiliations
The authors evaluated the ability of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 1.5 T to characterize 28 adrenal masses, using several variables: signal intensity ratios (adrenal/liver and adrenal/fat) on T2- and T1-weighted images, and the calculated T2 relaxation time of the adrenal mass. Signal intensity ratios were unreliable in distinguishing adenomas from nonadenomas. The calculated T2 relaxation time was more useful: All 15 adrenal masses with a T2 of less than 60 msec were adenomas. A T2 greater than 60 msec was less specific and included six metastases, two pheochromocytomas, one adrenal carcinoma, two adrenal hemorrhages, and two nonhyper-functioning adenomas. Therefore, T2 values are more accurate than signal intensity ratios for characterization of adrenal masses at 1.5 T. The unsuitability of previously published criteria determined with 0.35- and 0.5-T systems may reflect the change of T1 and T2 relaxation times with field strength, altering the relative T1 and T2 weighting by a given pulse sequence.
Multimodality imaging of adrenal gland pathologies: A comprehensive pictorial review.
Paloka R, Gopireddy D, Virarkar M, Galgano S, Morani A, Adimula P J Clin Imaging Sci. 2023; 12:62.
PMID: 36601600 PMC: 9805616. DOI: 10.25259/JCIS_92_2022.
Adrenal phaeochromocytoma: correlation of MRI appearances with histology and function.
Jacques A, Sahdev A, Sandrasagara M, Goldstein R, Berney D, Rockall A Eur Radiol. 2008; 18(12):2885-92.
PMID: 18641999 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-008-1073-z.
van Gils A, van Erkel A, Falke T, Pauwels E Eur J Nucl Med. 1994; 21(3):239-53.
PMID: 8200393 DOI: 10.1007/BF00188673.
Laparoscopic removal of pheochromocytoma. Why? When? and Who? (reflections on one case report).
Meurisse M, Joris J, Hamoir E, Hubert B, Charlier C Surg Endosc. 1995; 9(4):431-6.
PMID: 7660270 DOI: 10.1007/BF00187168.
[Traumatic hematoma of the adrenal gland simulating pheochromocytoma. A case report].
Bruckner M, Durig M Unfallchirurgie. 1992; 18(5):311-4.
PMID: 1441002 DOI: 10.1007/BF02588214.