Economic Evaluation of Price Discounts and Skill-building Strategies on Purchase and Consumption of Healthy Food and Beverages: The SHELf Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: Pricing strategies are a promising approach for promoting healthier dietary choices. However, robust evidence of the cost-effectiveness of pricing manipulations on dietary behaviour is limited. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of a 20% price reduction on fruits and vegetables and a combined skills-based behaviour change and price reduction intervention.
Design And Methods: Cost-effectiveness analysis from a societal perspective was undertaken for the randomized controlled trial Supermarket Healthy Eating for Life (SHELf). Female shoppers in Melbourne, Australia were randomized to: (1) skill-building (n = 160); (2) price reductions (n = 161); (3) combined skill-building and price reduction (n = 161); or (4) control group (n = 161). The intervention was implemented for three months followed by a six month follow-up. Costs were measured in 2012 Australian dollars. Fruit and vegetable purchasing and consumption were measured in grams/week.
Results: At three months, compared to control participants, price reduction participants increased vegetable purchases by 233 g/week (95% CI 4 to 462, p = 0.046) and fruit purchases by 364 g/week (95% CI 95 to 633, p = 0.008). Participants in the combined group purchased 280 g/week more fruits (95% CI 27 to 533, p = 0.03) than participants in the control group. Increases were not maintained six-month post intervention. No effect was noticed in the skill-building group. Compared to the control group, the price reduction intervention cost an additional A$2.3 per increased serving of vegetables purchased per week or an additional A$3 per increased serving of fruit purchased per week. The combined intervention cost an additional A$12 per increased serving of fruit purchased per week compared to the control group.
Conclusions: A 20% discount on fruits and vegetables was effective in promoting overall fruit and vegetable purchases during the period the discount was active and may be cost-effective. The price discount program gave better value for money than the combined price reduction and skill-building intervention. The SHELf trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials Registration ISRCTN39432901.
Quach A, Yohannes S, Olstad D, Campbell D, Corrigan C, Beall R BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):689.
PMID: 39972336 PMC: 11841262. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21855-9.
Vogel C, Dijkstra C, Huitink M, Dhuria P, Poelman M, Mackenbach J Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2023; 20(1):73.
PMID: 37340326 PMC: 10280909. DOI: 10.1186/s12966-023-01448-8.
Ananthapavan J, Sacks G, Orellana L, Marshall J, Robinson E, Moodie M Nutrients. 2022; 14(9).
PMID: 35565886 PMC: 9103654. DOI: 10.3390/nu14091919.
Jenneson V, Pontin F, Greenwood D, Clarke G, Morris M Nutr Rev. 2021; 80(6):1711-1722.
PMID: 34757399 PMC: 9086796. DOI: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab089.
Di Noia J, Monica D, Jensen H, Sikorskii A Public Health Nutr. 2021; 24(12):3922-3928.
PMID: 33972002 PMC: 8373716. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980021001981.