Ambiguity in Tactile Apparent Motion Perception
Overview
Affiliations
Background: In von Schiller's Stroboscopic Alternative Motion (SAM) stimulus two visually presented diagonal dot pairs, located on the corners of an imaginary rectangle, alternate with each other and induce either horizontal, vertical or, rarely, rotational motion percepts. SAM motion perception can be described by a psychometric function of the dot aspect ratio ("AR", i.e. the relation between vertical and horizontal dot distances). Further, with equal horizontal and vertical dot distances (AR = 1) perception is biased towards vertical motion. In a series of five experiments, we presented tactile SAM versions and studied the role of AR and of different reference frames for the perception of tactile apparent motion.
Methods: We presented tactile SAM stimuli and varied the ARs, while participants reported the perceived motion directions. Pairs of vibration stimulators were attached to the participants' forearms and stimulator distances were varied within and between forearms. We compared straight and rotated forearm conditions with each other in order to disentangle the roles of exogenous and endogenous reference frames.
Results: Increasing the tactile SAM's AR biased perception towards vertical motion, but the effect was weak compared to the visual modality. We found no horizontal disambiguation, even for very small tactile ARs. A forearm rotation by 90° kept the vertical bias, even though it was now coupled with small ARs. A 45° rotation condition with crossed forearms, however, evoked a strong horizontal motion bias.
Discussion: Existing approaches to explain the visual SAM bias fail to explain the current tactile results. Particularly puzzling is the strong horizontal bias in the crossed-forearm conditions. In the case of tactile apparent motion, there seem to be no fixed priority rule for perceptual disambiguation. Rather the weighting of available evidence seems to depend on the degree of stimulus ambiguity, the current situation and on the perceptual strategy of the individual observer.
Costa G, Schaum M, Duarte J, Martins R, Duarte I, Castelhano J Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(12):e26779.
PMID: 39185735 PMC: 11345702. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.26779.
Altered Perception of the Bistable Motion Quartet in Albinism.
Al-Nosairy K, Quanz E, Eick C, Hoffmann M, Kornmeier J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(14):39.
PMID: 38015177 PMC: 10691394. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.14.39.
Sariyildiz E, Hanss F, Zhou H, Sreenivasa M, Armitage L, Mutlu R Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(20).
PMID: 37896585 PMC: 10611249. DOI: 10.3390/s23208492.
Spontaneous Necker-cube reversals may not be that spontaneous.
Wilson M, Hecker L, Joos E, Aertsen A, Tebartz van Elst L, Kornmeier J Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1179081.
PMID: 37323933 PMC: 10268006. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1179081.
Hierarchical processing underpins competition in tactile perceptual bistability.
Darki F, Ferrario A, Rankin J J Comput Neurosci. 2023; 51(3):343-360.
PMID: 37204542 PMC: 10404575. DOI: 10.1007/s10827-023-00852-0.