» Articles » PMID: 27168740

Effect of Coronary Artery Revascularization on In-hospital Outcomes and Long-term Prognoses in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients with Prior Ischemic Stroke

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2016 May 12
PMID 27168740
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether coronary artery revascularization therapies (CART), including percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), can improve the in-hospital and long-term outcomes for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients with prior ischemic stroke (IS).

Methods: A total of 387 AMI patients with prior IS were enrolled consecutively from January 15, 2005 to December 24, 2011 in this cohort study. All patients were categorized into the CART group (n = 204) or the conservative medications (CM) group (n = 183). In-hospital cardiocerebral events and long-term mortality of the two groups after an average follow-up of 36 months were recorded by Kaplan-Meier survival curves and compared by Logistic regression and the Cox regression model.

Results: The CART patients were younger (66.5 ± 9.7 years vs. 71.7 ± 9.7 years, P < 0.01), had less non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (11.8% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.016) and more multiple-vascular coronary lesions (50% vs. 69.4%, P = 0.031). The hospitalization incidence of cardiocerebral events in the CART group was 9.3% while 26.2% in the CM group (P < 0.01). CART significantly reduced the risk of in-hospital cardiocerebral events by 65% [adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.13-0.92]. By the end of follow-up, 57 cases (41.6%) died in CM group (n = 137) and 24 cases (12.2%) died in CART group (n = 197). Cox regression indicated that CART decreased the long-term mortality by 72% [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) = 0.28, 95% CI: 0.06-0.46], while categorical analysis indicated no significant difference between PCI and CABG.

Conclusions: CART has a significant effect on improving the in-hospital and long-term prognoses for AMI patients with prior IS.

References
1.
Smit Y, Vlayen J, Koppenaal H, Eefting F, Kappetein A, Mariani M . Percutaneous coronary invervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014; 149(3):831-8.e1-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.10.112. View

2.
. The effects of tissue plasminogen activator, streptokinase, or both on coronary-artery patency, ventricular function, and survival after acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 1993; 329(22):1615-22. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199311253292204. View

3.
Capodanno D, Capranzano P, Tamburino C . CABG versus PCI in diabetic patients with multivessel disease after risk stratification by the SYNTAX score: a pooled analysis of the SYNTAX and FREEDOM trials. Int J Cardiol. 2014; 173(3):548-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.03.077. View

4.
Alfonso F, Collet J, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C . 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special.... Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 46(4):517-92. DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. View

5.
Kristensen S, Laut K, Fajadet J, Kaifoszova Z, Kala P, Di Mario C . Reperfusion therapy for ST elevation acute myocardial infarction 2010/2011: current status in 37 ESC countries. Eur Heart J. 2014; 35(29):1957-70. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht529. View