Prevalence of Glaucoma in the United States: The 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Overview

Journal Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci

Specialty Ophthalmology

Date 2016 May 12

PMID 27168366

Citations 66

Authors

Priya Gupta

Di Zhao

Eliseo Guallar

Fang Ko

Michael V Boland

David S Friedman

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of glaucoma in the US population based on optic nerve head photography, to estimate the prevalence of glaucoma awareness, and to identify demographic and ocular risk factors for being unaware of having glaucoma.

Methods: The study included 5746 men and women 40 years of age and older participating in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2008. Each participant had 45° photographs of the macula and optic disc of both eyes. Fundus photographs were first graded by a reading center, and those with a cup-to-disc ratio (CDR) ≥ 0.6 were regraded by three glaucoma specialists to determine the presence or absence of glaucoma. Analyses were performed using NHANES weights to account for the complex multistage probability sampling design.

Results: The estimated overall prevalence of glaucoma in the US civilian, noninstitutionalized population 40 years of age and older was 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7%-2.6%). Glaucoma affected 2.9 million individuals, including 1.4 million women; 1.5 million men; 2.3 million people 60 years of age and older; and 0.9 million blacks, Mexican Americans, and people of other races. The prevalence of glaucoma was highest in non-Hispanic blacks, followed by non-Hispanic whites, Mexican Americans, and others. Over half of participants with glaucoma were unaware that they had the disease.

Conclusions: The prevalence of glaucoma based on optic nerve fundus photography assessment in the general US population 40 years of age and older was 2.1%. Approximately half of glaucoma cases were previously undiagnosed. Studies to determine whether and how to identify undiagnosed glaucoma are an important next step.

Citing Articles

A cross-sectional study of the association between dietary inflammatory index and glaucoma prevalence in a US population.

Chen W, Zhang L Int J Ophthalmol. 2025; 18(1):139-145.

PMID: 39829616 PMC: 11672095. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2025.01.17.

Advancing Glaucoma Treatment During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: Contemporary Management Strategies and Prospective Therapeutic Developments.

Salvetat M, Toro M, Pellegrini F, Scollo P, Malaguarnera R, Musa M Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767592 PMC: 11727364. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122685.

The Association Between Intermittent Fasting and Glaucoma.

Schulz M, Ding L, Feng S, Chen A, Chen P, Bojikian K J Glaucoma. 2024; 34(1):1-6.

PMID: 39445885 PMC: 11634075. DOI: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002515.

Early diagnostics and interventional glaucoma.

De Francesco T, Bacharach J, Smith O, Shah M Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2024; 16:25158414241287431.

PMID: 39421852 PMC: 11483761. DOI: 10.1177/25158414241287431.

Prevalence of Glaucoma Among US Adults in 2022.

Ehrlich J, Burke-Conte Z, Wittenborn J, Saaddine J, Omura J, Friedman D JAMA Ophthalmol. 2024; 142(11):1046-1053.

PMID: 39418040 PMC: 11581589. DOI: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.3884.

References

Quigley H, West S, Rodriguez J, Munoz B, Klein R, Snyder R . The prevalence of glaucoma in a population-based study of Hispanic subjects: Proyecto VER. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119(12):1819-26. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.119.12.1819. View

Wang J, Mitchell P, Cumming R, Smith W . Visual impairment and nursing home placement in older Australians: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2003; 10(1):3-13. DOI: 10.1076/opep.10.1.3.13773. View

Friedman D, Wolfs R, OColmain B, Klein B, Taylor H, West S . Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma among adults in the United States. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122(4):532-8. PMC: 2798086. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.122.4.532. View

Varma R, Ying-Lai M, Francis B, Nguyen B, Deneen J, Wilson M . Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension in Latinos: the Los Angeles Latino Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 2004; 111(8):1439-48. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2004.01.025. View

Mason R, Kosoko O, Wilson M, Martone J, Cowan Jr C, Gear J . National survey of the prevalence and risk factors of glaucoma in St. Lucia, West Indies. Part I. Prevalence findings. Ophthalmology. 1989; 96(9):1363-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(89)32708-4. View

Tielsch J, Sommer A, Katz J, Royall R, Quigley H, Javitt J . Racial variations in the prevalence of primary open-angle glaucoma. The Baltimore Eye Survey. JAMA. 1991; 266(3):369-74. View

Klein B, Klein R, Sponsel W, Franke T, Cantor L, Martone J . Prevalence of glaucoma. The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1992; 99(10):1499-504. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(92)31774-9. View

Coffey M, Reidy A, Wormald R, Xian W, Wright L, Courtney P . Prevalence of glaucoma in the west of Ireland. Br J Ophthalmol. 1993; 77(1):17-21. PMC: 504415. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.77.1.17. View

Leske M, Connell A, Schachat A, Hyman L . The Barbados Eye Study. Prevalence of open angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112(6):821-9. DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1994.01090180121046. View

10.

Mitchell P, Smith W, Attebo K, Healey P . Prevalence of open-angle glaucoma in Australia. The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Ophthalmology. 1996; 103(10):1661-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(96)30449-1. View

11.

Wensor M, McCarty C, Stanislavsky Y, Livingston P, Taylor H . The prevalence of glaucoma in the Melbourne Visual Impairment Project. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105(4):733-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0161-6420(98)94031-3. View

12.

Pierre-Filho P, Schimiti R, de Vasconcellos J, Costa V . Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2006; 84(3):345-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2006.00639.x. View

13.

Burr J, Mowatt G, Hernandez R, Siddiqui M, Cook J, Lourenco T . The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening for open angle glaucoma: a systematic review and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(41):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-190. DOI: 10.3310/hta11410. View

14.

Terry A, Paulose-Ram R, Tilert T, Johnson C, Zhang X, Lee P . The methodology of visual field testing with frequency doubling technology in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005-2006. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2010; 17(6):411-21. DOI: 10.3109/09286586.2010.528575. View

15.

Ramdas W, Rizopoulos D, Wolfs R, Hofman A, de Jong P, Vingerling J . Defining glaucomatous optic neuropathy from a continuous measure of optic nerve damage - the optimal cut-off point for risk-factor analysis in population-based epidemiology. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2011; 18(5):211-6. DOI: 10.3109/09286586.2011.595038. View

16.

Vajaranant T, Wu S, Torres M, Varma R . The changing face of primary open-angle glaucoma in the United States: demographic and geographic changes from 2011 to 2050. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154(2):303-314.e3. PMC: 3401269. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2012.02.024. View

17.

Zhang X, Cotch M, Ryskulova A, Primo S, Nair P, Chou C . Vision health disparities in the United States by race/ethnicity, education, and economic status: findings from two nationally representative surveys. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012; 154(6 Suppl):S53-62.e1. PMC: 4169111. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2011.08.045. View

18.

Klein R, Klein B . The prevalence of age-related eye diseases and visual impairment in aging: current estimates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013; 54(14):ORSF5-ORSF13. PMC: 4139275. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12789. View

19.

Zhao D, Cho J, Kim M, Friedman D, Guallar E . Diabetes, glucose metabolism, and glaucoma: the 2005-2008 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e112460. PMC: 4231045. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112460. View

20.

Tham Y, Li X, Wong T, Quigley H, Aung T, Cheng C . Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2014; 121(11):2081-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.05.013. View