» Articles » PMID: 27163933

Smoking Behavior and Healthcare Expenditure in the United States, 1992-2009: Panel Data Estimates

Overview
Journal PLoS Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2016 May 11
PMID 27163933
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Reductions in smoking in Arizona and California have been shown to be associated with reduced per capita healthcare expenditures in these states compared to control populations in the rest of the US. This paper extends that analysis to all states and estimates changes in healthcare expenditure attributable to changes in aggregate measures of smoking behavior in all states.

Methods And Findings: State per capita healthcare expenditure is modeled as a function of current smoking prevalence, mean cigarette consumption per smoker, other demographic and economic factors, and cross-sectional time trends using a fixed effects panel data regression on annual time series data for each the 50 states and the District of Columbia for the years 1992 through 2009. We found that 1% relative reductions in current smoking prevalence and mean packs smoked per current smoker are associated with 0.118% (standard error [SE] 0.0259%, p < 0.001) and 0.108% (SE 0.0253%, p < 0.001) reductions in per capita healthcare expenditure (elasticities). The results of this study are subject to the limitations of analysis of aggregate observational data, particularly that a study of this nature that uses aggregate data and a relatively small sample size cannot, by itself, establish a causal connection between smoking behavior and healthcare costs. Historical regional variations in smoking behavior (including those due to the effects of state tobacco control programs, smoking restrictions, and differences in taxation) are associated with substantial differences in per capita healthcare expenditures across the United States. Those regions (and the states in them) that have lower smoking have substantially lower medical costs. Likewise, those that have higher smoking have higher medical costs. Sensitivity analysis confirmed that these results are robust.

Conclusions: Changes in healthcare expenditure appear quickly after changes in smoking behavior. A 10% relative drop in smoking in every state is predicted to be followed by an expected $63 billion reduction (in 2012 US dollars) in healthcare expenditure the next year. State and national policies that reduce smoking should be part of short term healthcare cost containment.

Citing Articles

Environmental Quality, Extreme Heat, and Healthcare Expenditures.

Becker D Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(10).

PMID: 39457295 PMC: 11507527. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21101322.


Impact of Healthy Lifestyle Factors on Life Expectancy and Lifetime Health Care Expenditure: Nationwide Cohort Study.

Lo W, Hu T, Shih C, Lin H, Hwang J JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2024; 10:e57045.

PMID: 39018094 PMC: 11292159. DOI: 10.2196/57045.


Examining the Association between Abstinence from Smoking and Healthcare Costs among Patients with Cancer.

Kypriotakis G, Kim S, Karam-Hage M, Robinson J, Minnix J, Blalock J Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2023; 17(5):217-225.

PMID: 37940143 PMC: 11097145. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0245.


The Economics of Tobacco Regulation: A Comprehensive Review.

DeCicca P, Kenkel D, Lovenheim M J Econ Lit. 2023; 60(3):883-970.

PMID: 37075070 PMC: 10072869. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20201482.


Smoking and healthcare expenditure reductions associated with the California Tobacco Control Program, 1989 to 2019: A predictive validation.

Lightwood J, Anderson S, Glantz S PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0263579.

PMID: 36928830 PMC: 10019627. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263579.


References
1.
Warner K, Hodgson T, Carroll C . Medical costs of smoking in the United States: estimates, their validity, and their implications. Tob Control. 1999; 8(3):290-300. PMC: 1763946. DOI: 10.1136/tc.8.3.290. View

2.
Fix B, Hyland A, OConnor R, Cummings K, Fong G, Chaloupka F . A novel approach to estimating the prevalence of untaxed cigarettes in the USA: findings from the 2009 and 2010 international tobacco control surveys. Tob Control. 2013; 23 Suppl 1:i61-6. PMC: 3984758. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051038. View

3.
Davis K, Grimshaw V, Merriman D, Farrelly M, Chernick H, Coady M . Cigarette trafficking in five northeastern US cities. Tob Control. 2013; 23(e1):e62-8. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051244. View

4.
Max W, Sung H, Lightwood J . The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016. Tob Control. 2012; 22(e1):e10-5. DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130. View

5.
Pierce J, Messer K, White M, Kealey S, Cowling D . Forty years of faster decline in cigarette smoking in California explains current lower lung cancer rates. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19(11):2801-10. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0563. View