» Articles » PMID: 27160505

Treatment Intensification for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Poor Glycaemic Control

Overview
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 2016 May 11
PMID 27160505
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: To identify the time to and patient characteristics associated with treatment intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and poor glycaemic control.

Methods: Using a large US insurance claims database, we conducted a retrospective cohort study among adult patients with T2D and glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥8% (index date) after ≥3 months of therapy including metformin. Patients were required to have continuous enrolment for at least 12 months before (baseline) and after index date, and no injectable antidiabetes medications. We defined treatment intensification as prescription fill for injectable or additional oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). Cox modelling was performed to identify factors associated with time to treatment intensification.

Results: For the 11 525 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, the mean age at index date was 57 years, 40% were female and the mean index HbA1c was 9.1%. Overall, 37% of patients had their treatment intensified <6 months after, 11% had their treatment intensified 6-12 months after, and 52% did not have their treatment intensified <12 months after the index date. A higher index HbA1c was associated with early intensification [hazard ratio (HR) 1.18 for HbA1c ≥9 to <10% and HR 1.41 for HbA1c ≥10% compared with HbA1c ≥8 to <9%; p < 0.0001), and later line of therapy was associated with late intensification (HR 0.78 for metformin with one OAD and HR 0.68 for metformin with ≥2 OADs compared with metformin monotherapy; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: Fewer than half of patients with T2D and treatment failure received intensification within 12 months in a real-world US population. Factors associated with treatment inertia can be used to target clinical care for these patients.

Citing Articles

Clinical inertia and treatment intensification among patients with type ii diabetes mellitus at Debre Tabor comprehensive specialized hospital, Ethiopia: an institutional-based cross-sectional study.

Dagnew S, Wondm S, Tarekegn G, Kassaw A, Moges T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2025; 16:1450928.

PMID: 39980847 PMC: 11839449. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1450928.


Fifteen-year trends in diabetes drug management and control in French-speaking Switzerland.

Pauli A, Alkandari A, Marques-Vidal P Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2025; 17(1):56.

PMID: 39940012 PMC: 11823013. DOI: 10.1186/s13098-025-01620-z.


Association of the glycemic background patterns and the diabetes management efficacy in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes.

Erbakan A, Arslan Bahadir M, Kaya F, Gulec B, Vural Keskinler M, Aktemur Celik U World J Diabetes. 2025; 16(1):98322.

PMID: 39817217 PMC: 11718454. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v16.i1.98322.


Modeling the Clinical and Economic Burden of Therapeutic Inertia in People with Type 2 Diabetes in Saudi Arabia.

Alluhidan M, Alturaiki A, Alabdulkarim H, Aljehani N, Alghamdi E, Alsabaan F Adv Ther. 2024; 41(11):4140-4152.

PMID: 39261418 PMC: 11480136. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02978-8.


A machine learning model to predict therapeutic inertia in type 2 diabetes using electronic health record data.

McDaniel C, Lo-Ciganic W, Huang J, Chou C J Endocrinol Invest. 2023; 47(6):1419-1433.

PMID: 38160431 DOI: 10.1007/s40618-023-02259-1.