» Articles » PMID: 27155604

ICU Physicians' and Nurses' Perceptions of Terminal Extubation and Terminal Weaning: a Self-questionnaire Study

Abstract

Purpose: Terminal extubation (TE) and terminal weaning (TW) are the methods available for withdrawing mechanical ventilation. Perceptions of TE and TW by intensive care unit (ICU) staff may influence bedside practices and the feasibility of studies comparing these methods.

Methods: From January to June 2013, 5 nurses and 5 physicians in each of 46 (out of 70, 65.7 %) French ICUs completed an anonymous self-questionnaire. Clusters of staff members defined by perceptions of TE and TW were identified by exploratory analysis. Denominators for computing percentages were total numbers of responses to each item; cases with missing data were excluded for the relevant item.

Results: Of the 451 (98 %) participants (225 nurses and 226 physicians), 37 (8.4 %) had never or almost never performed TW and 138 (31.3 %) had never or almost never performed TE. A moral difference between TW and TE was perceived by 205 (45.8 %) participants. The exploratory analysis identified three clusters defined by personal beliefs about TW and TE: 21.2 % of participants preferred TW, 18.1 % preferred TE, and 60.7 % had no preference. A preference for TW seemed chiefly related to unfavorable perceptions or insufficient knowledge of TE. Staff members who preferred TE and those with no preference perceived TE as providing a more natural dying process with less ambiguity.

Conclusion: Nearly two-fifths of ICU nurses and physicians in participating ICUs preferred TW or TE. This finding suggests both a need for shared decision-making and training before performing TE or TW and a high risk of poor compliance with randomly allocated TW or TE.

Citing Articles

Limitation of life sustaining therapy in disorders of consciousness: ethics and practice.

Lissak I, Young M Brain. 2024; 147(7):2274-2288.

PMID: 38387081 PMC: 11224617. DOI: 10.1093/brain/awae060.


Terminal Extubation or Terminal Weaning: Is it Feasible in Indian Intensive Care Units?.

Kumar A, Bhat R, Mani R Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024; 28(2):103-105.

PMID: 38323253 PMC: 10839942. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24631.


Effect of Family Presence on the Success of Weaning in Intensive Care Units.

Arvinpour E, Shariati A, Sayadi N, Haghighi M Tanaffos. 2023; 21(3):367-375.

PMID: 37025322 PMC: 10073960.


Incidence and Risk Model Development for Severe Tachypnea Following Terminal Extubation.

Fehnel C, de la Hoz M, Celi L, Campbell M, Hanafy K, Nozari A Chest. 2020; 158(4):1456-1463.

PMID: 32360728 PMC: 7545486. DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.027.


Mechanical ventilation in medical departments: a necessary evil, or a blessing in bad disguise?.

Schwartz Y, Jarjoui A, Yinnon A Isr J Health Policy Res. 2019; 8(1):48.

PMID: 31159870 PMC: 6545679. DOI: 10.1186/s13584-019-0322-8.


References
1.
Wiegand D, Deatrick J, Knafl K . Family management styles related to withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy from adults who are acutely ill or injured. J Fam Nurs. 2008; 14(1):16-32. DOI: 10.1177/1074840707313338. View

2.
Lesieur O, Leloup M, Gonzalez F, Mamzer M . Withholding or withdrawal of treatment under French rules: a study performed in 43 intensive care units. Ann Intensive Care. 2015; 5(1):56. PMC: 4486647. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-015-0056-x. View

3.
Rocker G, Cook D, OCallaghan C, Pichora D, Dodek P, Conrad W . Canadian nurses' and respiratory therapists' perspectives on withdrawal of life support in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2005; 20(1):59-65. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.10.006. View

4.
Campbell M . How to withdraw mechanical ventilation: a systematic review of the literature. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2007; 18(4):397-403. DOI: 10.4037/15597768-2007-4008. View

5.
Curtis J, Vincent J . Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet. 2010; 376(9749):1347-53. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60143-2. View