» Articles » PMID: 27151343

Accuracy of the Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk Equation In a Large Contemporary, Multiethnic Population

Overview
Date 2016 May 7
PMID 27151343
Citations 137
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The accuracy of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Pooled Cohort Risk Equation for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events in contemporary and ethnically diverse populations is not well understood.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the 2013 ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equation within a large, multiethnic population in clinical care.

Methods: The target population for consideration of cholesterol-lowering therapy in a large, integrated health care delivery system population was identified in 2008 and followed up through 2013. The main analyses excluded those with known ASCVD, diabetes mellitus, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels <70 or ≥190 mg/dl, prior lipid-lowering therapy use, or incomplete 5-year follow-up. Patient characteristics were obtained from electronic medical records, and ASCVD events were ascertained by using validated algorithms for hospitalization databases and death certificates. We compared predicted versus observed 5-year ASCVD risk, overall and according to sex and race/ethnicity. We additionally examined predicted versus observed risk in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Results: Among 307,591 eligible adults without diabetes between 40 and 75 years of age, 22,283 were black, 52,917 were Asian/Pacific Islander, and 18,745 were Hispanic. We observed 2,061 ASCVD events during 1,515,142 person-years. In each 5-year predicted ASCVD risk category, observed 5-year ASCVD risk was substantially lower: 0.20% for predicted risk <2.50%; 0.65% for predicted risk 2.50% to <3.75%; 0.90% for predicted risk 3.75% to <5.00%; and 1.85% for predicted risk ≥5.00% (C statistic: 0.74). Similar ASCVD risk overestimation and poor calibration with moderate discrimination (C statistic: 0.68 to 0.74) were observed in sex, racial/ethnic, and socioeconomic status subgroups, and in sensitivity analyses among patients receiving statins for primary prevention. Calibration among 4,242 eligible adults with diabetes was improved, but discrimination was worse (C statistic: 0.64).

Conclusions: In a large, contemporary "real-world" population, the ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Risk Equation substantially overestimated actual 5-year risk in adults without diabetes, overall and across sociodemographic subgroups.

Citing Articles

United States Pooled Cohort Cardiovascular Disease Risk Scores in Adults With Diabetes Mellitus.

Zhao Y, DAgostino Sr R, Malik S, Watson K, Bertoni A, Budoff M JACC Adv. 2025; 4(1):101448.

PMID: 39759441 PMC: 11699612. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101448.


Precision Medicine for Cardiovascular Prevention and Population Health: A Bridge Too Far?.

Giugni F, Berry J, Khera A, Shah A, de Lemos J Circulation. 2024; 150(21):1720-1731.

PMID: 39556656 PMC: 11575940. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.070081.


Risk-enhancing factors and social determinants of health in risk assessment for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

Zhang Y, An J, Xia M, Zhou H, Sun Y, Chung J PLoS One. 2024; 19(10):e0312756.

PMID: 39453943 PMC: 11508156. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312756.


Preventing ASCVD Events: Using Coronary Artery Calcification Scores to Personalize Risk and Guide Statin Therapy.

Kupfer J, Silvet H, Aguayo S Fed Pract. 2024; 41(5):142-148.

PMID: 39398965 PMC: 11468628. DOI: 10.12788/fp.0433.


Improving Cardiovascular Disease Primary Prevention Treatment Thresholds in a New England Health Care System.

Cho S, Rivera R, Koyama S, Kim M, Ganesh S, Bhattacharya R JACC Adv. 2024; 3(10):101257.

PMID: 39290815 PMC: 11406032. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101257.


References
1.
Krumholz H . The new cholesterol and blood pressure guidelines: perspective on the path forward. JAMA. 2014; 311(14):1403-5. PMC: 5459388. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.2634. View

2.
Hlatky M, Ray R, Burwen D, Margolis K, Johnson K, Kucharska-Newton A . Use of Medicare data to identify coronary heart disease outcomes in the Women's Health Initiative. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2014; 7(1):157-62. PMC: 4548886. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000373. View

3.
Andersson C, Enserro D, Larson M, Xanthakis V, Vasan R . Implications of the US cholesterol guidelines on eligibility for statin therapy in the community: comparison of observed and predicted risks in the Framingham Heart Study Offspring Cohort. J Am Heart Assoc. 2015; 4(4). PMC: 4579932. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.115.001888. View

4.
Amin N, Martin S, Blaha M, Nasir K, Blumenthal R, Michos E . Headed in the right direction but at risk for miscalculation: a critical appraisal of the 2013 ACC/AHA risk assessment guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 63(25 Pt A):2789-94. PMC: 4280905. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.04.010. View

5.
DeFilippis A, Young R, Carrubba C, McEvoy J, Budoff M, Blumenthal R . An analysis of calibration and discrimination among multiple cardiovascular risk scores in a modern multiethnic cohort. Ann Intern Med. 2015; 162(4):266-75. PMC: 4414494. DOI: 10.7326/M14-1281. View