» Articles » PMID: 27150438

High Risk of Fistula Formation in Vacuum-assisted Closure Therapy in Patients with Open Abdomen Due to Secondary Peritonitis-a Retrospective Analysis

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2016 May 7
PMID 27150438
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of vacuum-assisted closure therapy in patients with open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis and to identify possible risk factors of fistula formation.

Methods: The hospital OPS-database (time period 2005-2014) was searched to identify patients treated with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis, who underwent vacuum-assisted closure therapy. Medical records were retrospectively analyzed for patients' characteristics, cause of peritonitis, duration of vacuum therapy, number of relaparotomies, fascial closure rates, and risk factors of fistula formation.

Results: Forty-three patients (19 male, 24 female) with a median age of 65 years (range 24-90 years) were identified. The major cause of secondary peritonitis was anastomotic leakage after intestinal anastomosis or bowel perforation, the median APACHE II score was 11. Median duration of VAC treatment was 12 days (range 3-88 days). Twenty of 43 (47 %) patients died from septic complications. Delayed fascial closure was obtained by suturing in 20 of 43 patients (47 %). Overall 16 of 43 (37 %) patients developed enteroatmospheric fistulas. Re-explorations after starting VAC treatment and duration of VAC therapy were significantly associated with the occurrence of enteroatmospheric fistulas (p < 0.001). ROC curve analysis determined the optimal duration of VAC therapy to reduce the risk of fistula formation at 13 days.

Conclusions: Long-term VAC treatment of patients with an open abdomen due to secondary peritonitis results in a relatively low fascial closure rate and a high risk of fistula formation.

Citing Articles

Vacuum-Assisted Closure Significantly Reduces Surgical Postoperative Complications Compared With Primary Abdominal Closure in Patients With Secondary Peritonitis: A Comparative Retrospective Study.

Rajabaleyan P, Vang A, Moller S, Khalaf S, Ladegaard A, Qvist N World J Surg. 2025; 49(2):387-400.

PMID: 39794299 PMC: 11798683. DOI: 10.1002/wjs.12472.


Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy: A Novel Approach for Terminal Ileum Anastomosis Success.

Perez-Restrepo M, Moya-Ortiz C, Eslait-Olaciregui S, Baez-Lopez D, Paez N, Pineros Nieto D Am J Case Rep. 2025; 26():e945745.

PMID: 39754351 PMC: 11706434. DOI: 10.12659/AJCR.945745.


Outcomes and associated factors of open abdomen after urgent laparotomy at a University Hospital in Southern Brazil: a retrospective study.

Silva A, Shehadeh I, Knaut E, Prajiante Bertolino E, Fontes C Rev Col Bras Cir. 2024; 51:e20243653.

PMID: 39166609 PMC: 11449506. DOI: 10.1590/0100-6991e-20243653-en.


Primary anastomosis and suturing combined with vacuum-assisted abdominal closure in patients with secondary peritonitis due to perforation of the small intestine: a retrospective study.

Rajabaleyan P, Jensen R, Moller S, Qvist N, Ellebaek M BMC Surg. 2023; 23(1):280.

PMID: 37715227 PMC: 10503050. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02179-0.


Vacuum-assisted closure versus on-demand relaparotomy in patients with secondary peritonitis-the VACOR trial: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Rajabaleyan P, Michelsen J, Tange Holst U, Moller S, Toft P, Luxhoi J World J Emerg Surg. 2022; 17(1):25.

PMID: 35619144 PMC: 9137120. DOI: 10.1186/s13017-022-00427-x.


References
1.
Pliakos I, Papavramidis T, Michalopoulos N, Deligiannidis N, Kesisoglou I, Sapalidis K . The value of vacuum-assisted closure in septic patients treated with laparostomy. Am Surg. 2012; 78(9):957-61. View

2.
Bruhin A, Ferreira F, Chariker M, Smith J, Runkel N . Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen. Int J Surg. 2014; 12(10):1105-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.08.396. View

3.
Bosscha K, Hulstaert P, Visser M, van Vroonhoven T, van der Werken C . Open management of the abdomen and planned reoperations in severe bacterial peritonitis. Eur J Surg. 2000; 166(1):44-9. DOI: 10.1080/110241500750009690. View

4.
Atema J, Gans S, Boermeester M . Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. World J Surg. 2014; 39(4):912-25. DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2883-6. View

5.
Goussous N, Kim B, Jenkins D, Zielinski M . Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient. Surgery. 2012; 152(4):777-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.015. View