» Articles » PMID: 27148023

Event Related Potentials Reveal Early Phonological and Orthographic Processing of Single Letters in Letter-Detection and Letter-Rhyme Paradigms

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2016 May 6
PMID 27148023
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: When and where phonological processing occurs in the brain is still under some debate. Most paired-rhyme and phonological priming studies used word stimuli, which involve complex neural networks for word recognition and semantics. This study investigates early (<300 ms) and late (>300 ms) orthographic and phonological processing of letters.

Methods: Fifteen participants aged 20-35 engaged in three two-forced choice experiments, one letter-detection (LetterID) and two letter-rhyme (Paired-Rhyme and Letter-Rhyme) tasks. From the EEG recordings, event related potential (ERP) differences within and across task stimuli were found. We also calculated the global field power (GFP) for each participant. Accuracies and reaction times were also measured from their button presses for each task.

Results: Behavioral: Reaction times were 18 ms faster to letter than pseudoletter stimuli, and 27 ms faster to rhyme than nonrhyme stimuli.

Erp/gfp: In the LetterID task, grand-mean evoked potentials (EPs) showed typical P1, N1, P2, and P3 waveform morphologies to letter and pseudoletter stimuli, with GFPs to pseudoletters being greater than letters from 160-600 ms. Across both rhyme tasks, there were greater negativities for nonrhyme than for rhyme stimuli at 145 ms and 426 ms. The P2 effect for rhyme stimuli was smaller than letter stimuli when compared across tasks.

Conclusion: Differences in early processing of letters vs. pseudoletters between 130-190 ms suggest that letters are processed earlier and perhaps faster in the brain than pseudoletters. The P2 effect between letter and rhyme stimuli likely reflect sublexical phonological processing. Together, findings from our study fill in evidence for the temporal dynamics of orthographic and phonological processing of single letters.

Citing Articles

The Influence of Probiotic Supplementation on the Obesity Indexes, Neuroinflammatory and Oxidative Stress Markers, Gut Microbial Diversity, and Working Memory in Obese Thai Children.

Khongtan S, Sivamaruthi B, Thangaleela S, Kesika P, Bharathi M, Sirilun S Foods. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959009 PMC: 10648263. DOI: 10.3390/foods12213890.


Effectiveness of Fish Oil-DHA Supplementation for Cognitive Function in Thai Children: A Randomized, Doubled-Blind, Two-Dose, Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial.

Sittiprapaporn P, Bumrungpert A, Suyajai P, Stough C Foods. 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36076781 PMC: 9455812. DOI: 10.3390/foods11172595.


An electrophysiological investigation of orthographic spatial integration in reading.

Snell J, Meade G, Meeter M, Holcomb P, Grainger J Neuropsychologia. 2019; 129:276-283.

PMID: 31002854 PMC: 6582630. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.009.


Brain Responses to Letters and Speech Sounds and Their Correlations With Cognitive Skills Related to Reading in Children.

Xu W, Kolozsvari O, Monto S, Hamalainen J Front Hum Neurosci. 2018; 12:304.

PMID: 30127729 PMC: 6088176. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00304.

References
1.
Herdman A . Functional communication within a perceptual network processing letters and pseudoletters. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2011; 28(5):441-9. DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0b013e318230da5f. View

2.
Rumelhart D, McClelland J . An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. Psychol Rev. 1982; 89(1):60-94. View

3.
Picton T, Bentin S, Berg P, Donchin E, Hillyard S, Johnson Jr R . Guidelines for using human event-related potentials to study cognition: recording standards and publication criteria. Psychophysiology. 2000; 37(2):127-52. View

4.
Bentin S, Mouchetant-Rostaing Y, Giard M, Echallier J, Pernier J . ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution. J Cogn Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):235-60. DOI: 10.1162/089892999563373. View

5.
Rugg M, Barrett S . Event-related potentials and the interaction between orthographic and phonological information in a rhyme-judgment task. Brain Lang. 1987; 32(2):336-61. DOI: 10.1016/0093-934x(87)90132-5. View