Improving Interference Control in ADHD Patients with Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)

Overview

Journal Front Cell Neurosci

Specialty Cell Biology

Date 2016 May 6

PMID 27147964

Citations 38

Authors

Carolin Breitling

Tino Zaehle

Moritz Dannhauer

Bjorn Bonath

Jana Tegelbeckers

Hans-Henning Flechtner

Kerstin Krauel

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has been suggested as a promising alternative to psychopharmacological treatment approaches due to its local and network effects on brain activation. In the current study, we investigated the impact of tDCS over the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) on interference control in 21 male adolescents with ADHD and 21 age matched healthy controls aged 13-17 years, who underwent three separate sessions of tDCS (anodal, cathodal, and sham) while completing a Flanker task. Even though anodal stimulation appeared to diminish commission errors in the ADHD group, the overall analysis revealed no significant effect of tDCS. Since participants showed a considerable learning effect from the first to the second session, performance in the first session was separately analyzed. ADHD patients receiving sham stimulation in the first session showed impaired interference control compared to healthy control participants whereas ADHD patients who were exposed to anodal stimulation, showed comparable performance levels (commission errors, reaction time variability) to the control group. These results suggest that anodal tDCS of the right inferior frontal gyrus could improve interference control in patients with ADHD.

Citing Articles

Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Pediatric Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Krauel K, Brauer H, Breitling-Ziegler C, Freitag C, Luckhardt C, Muhlherr A JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2460477.

PMID: 39982727 PMC: 11846015. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.60477.

Noninvasive Brain Stimulation for Improving Cognitive Deficits and Clinical Symptoms in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Yin Y, Wang X, Feng T Brain Sci. 2025; 14(12.

PMID: 39766436 PMC: 11674686. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14121237.

Research progress of tDCS in the treatment of ADHD.

Huang R, Liu Y J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024; 132(2):237-251.

PMID: 39508850 PMC: 11785651. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02853-4.

Simultaneous and cumulative effects of tDCS on cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen in multiple sclerosis.

Muccio M, Pilloni G, Walton Masters L, He P, Krupp L, Datta A Front Hum Neurosci. 2024; 18:1418647.

PMID: 39081842 PMC: 11286420. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1418647.

The impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on attention bias modification in children with ADHD.

Nejati V, Estaji R J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2024; 131(7):823-832.

PMID: 38643330 DOI: 10.1007/s00702-024-02775-1.

References

Wostmann N, Aichert D, Costa A, Rubia K, Moller H, Ettinger U . Reliability and plasticity of response inhibition and interference control. Brain Cogn. 2012; 81(1):82-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2012.09.010. View

Heth I, Lavidor M . Improved reading measures in adults with dyslexia following transcranial direct current stimulation treatment. Neuropsychologia. 2015; 70:107-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.022. View

McIntire L, McKinley R, Goodyear C, Nelson J . A comparison of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and caffeine on vigilance and cognitive performance during extended wakefulness. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(4):499-507. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.04.008. View

Horvath J, Carter O, Forte J . Transcranial direct current stimulation: five important issues we aren't discussing (but probably should be). Front Syst Neurosci. 2014; 8:2. PMC: 3901383. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2014.00002. View

Monte-Silva K, Kuo M, Hessenthaler S, Fresnoza S, Liebetanz D, Paulus W . Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation. Brain Stimul. 2012; 6(3):424-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.04.011. View

Krishnan C, Santos L, Peterson M, Ehinger M . Safety of noninvasive brain stimulation in children and adolescents. Brain Stimul. 2014; 8(1):76-87. PMC: 4459719. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.012. View

de Berker A, Bikson M, Bestmann S . Predicting the behavioral impact of transcranial direct current stimulation: issues and limitations. Front Hum Neurosci. 2013; 7:613. PMC: 3790257. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00613. View

Prehn-Kristensen A, Munz M, Goder R, Wilhelm I, Korr K, Vahl W . Transcranial oscillatory direct current stimulation during sleep improves declarative memory consolidation in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder to a level comparable to healthy controls. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(6):793-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.07.036. View

Nitsche M, Paulus W . Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology. 2001; 57(10):1899-901. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899. View

10.

Goldman-Rakic P, Muly 3rd E, Williams G . D(1) receptors in prefrontal cells and circuits. Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000; 31(2-3):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0173(99)00045-4. View

11.

Kim J, Kim D, Chang W, Kim Y, Kim K, Im C . Inconsistent outcomes of transcranial direct current stimulation may originate from anatomical differences among individuals: electric field simulation using individual MRI data. Neurosci Lett. 2014; 564:6-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2014.01.054. View

12.

Luks T, Oliveira M, Possin K, Bird A, Miller B, Weiner M . Atrophy in two attention networks is associated with performance on a Flanker task in neurodegenerative disease. Neuropsychologia. 2009; 48(1):165-70. PMC: 3018338. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.09.001. View

13.

Nozari N, Woodard K, Thompson-Schill S . Consequences of cathodal stimulation for behavior: when does it help and when does it hurt performance?. PLoS One. 2014; 9(1):e84338. PMC: 3883650. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084338. View

14.

Sowell E, Thompson P, Welcome S, Henkenius A, Toga A, Peterson B . Cortical abnormalities in children and adolescents with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Lancet. 2003; 362(9397):1699-707. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14842-8. View

15.

Zhu D, Zacks R, Slade J . Brain activation during interference resolution in young and older adults: an fMRI study. Neuroimage. 2010; 50(2):810-7. PMC: 2823923. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.087. View

16.

Bortoletto M, Pellicciari M, Rodella C, Miniussi C . The interaction with task-induced activity is more important than polarization: a tDCS study. Brain Stimul. 2014; 8(2):269-76. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.11.006. View

17.

Lopez-Alonso V, Cheeran B, Rio-Rodriguez D, Fernandez-Del-Olmo M . Inter-individual variability in response to non-invasive brain stimulation paradigms. Brain Stimul. 2014; 7(3):372-80. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2014.02.004. View

18.

Fonov V, Evans A, Botteron K, Almli C, McKinstry R, Collins D . Unbiased average age-appropriate atlases for pediatric studies. Neuroimage. 2010; 54(1):313-27. PMC: 2962759. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.07.033. View

19.

Wodka E, Mahone E, Blankner J, Gidley Larson J, Fotedar S, Denckla M . Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007; 29(4):345-56. DOI: 10.1080/13803390600678046. View

20.

OConnell N, Cossar J, Marston L, Wand B, Bunce D, Moseley G . Rethinking clinical trials of transcranial direct current stimulation: participant and assessor blinding is inadequate at intensities of 2mA. PLoS One. 2012; 7(10):e47514. PMC: 3474749. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047514. View