Impulsivity and Attentional Bias As Predictors of Modafinil Treatment Outcome for Retention and Drug Use in Crack-cocaine Dependent Patients: Results of a Randomised Controlled Trial
Overview
Affiliations
Background: High impulsivity and attentional bias are common in cocaine-dependent patients and predict poor treatment outcomes. The pharmacological agent modafinil is studied for its cognitive-enhancing capacities and may therefore improve clinical outcomes in crack-cocaine dependent patients. In this study, we investigated first whether pre-treatment impulsivity and attentional bias predict treatment outcome; next whether the drug modafinil given as an add-on treatment to cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) improves impulsivity and attentional bias; and last, whether changes in impulsivity and attentional bias are related to improvements in treatment outcome.
Methods: Crack-cocaine dependent outpatients (n = 65) were randomised to 12 weeks CBT plus modafinil (400 mg/day) or only CBT. Self-reported impulsivity was assessed at baseline using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. At baseline and Week 12, we assessed inhibitory control as a behavioural measure of impulsivity, in terms of cognitive interference (Stroop task) and response inhibition ('stop-signal task'), and attentional bias with the addiction Stroop task. Clinical outcomes were CBT-retention and crack-cocaine use.
Results: At baseline, self-reported impulsivity predicted better CBT-retention; low self-reported and behavioural impulsivity and attentional bias predicted less crack-cocaine use. Changes in cognitive performance were not modafinil-related, but most likely due to low adherence. Improvements in impulsivity or attentional bias were not associated with CBT-retention nor changes in crack-cocaine use.
Conclusions: Baseline impulsivity and attentional bias predicted clinical outcomes in crack-cocaine dependent patients. There were no firm indications that modafinil reduced impulsivity nor attentional bias in this population. Future studies involving cognitive-enhancing medications should include strategies to optimise adherence, to be better able to evaluate their potential.
Predictors of cocaine use disorder treatment outcomes: a systematic review.
Palazon-Llecha A, Caparros B, Trujols J, Duran-Sindreu S, Batlle F, Madre M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):124.
PMID: 38720357 PMC: 11077740. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02550-z.
Loya J, Benitez B, Kiluk B Curr Addict Rep. 2024; 10(3):485-493.
PMID: 38269068 PMC: 10805411. DOI: 10.1007/s40429-023-00491-6.
Brynte C, Khemiri L, Stenstrom H, Konstenius M, Lindstrom N, Franck J BMC Psychiatry. 2023; 23(1):537.
PMID: 37488536 PMC: 10367266. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05034-x.
The Executive Functioning Paradox in Substance Use Disorders.
Jakubiec L, Chirokoff V, Abdallah M, Sanz-Arigita E, Dupuy M, Swendsen J Biomedicines. 2022; 10(11).
PMID: 36359247 PMC: 9687962. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112728.
Modafinil Does Not Reduce Cocaine Use in Methadone-Maintained Individuals.
DeVito E, Poling J, Babuscio T, Nich C, Carroll K, Sofuoglu M Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2022; 2.
PMID: 36310662 PMC: 9615926. DOI: 10.1016/j.dadr.2022.100032.