» Articles » PMID: 27145918

Using Resilience to Predict the Effects of Disturbance

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2016 May 6
PMID 27145918
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal behaviour emerges from a complex interaction between an individual's needs, life history strategies and the varying local environment. This environment is increasingly disturbed as human activity encroaches on previously unexposed regions. This disturbance can have different effects on individual animals or populations depending on their behavioural strategies. Here, we examine a means of predicting the resilience of individuals or populations to unanticipated disturbances, and we find that resilience that can be estimated from routinely collected behavioural observations is a good predictor of how rapidly an individual's expected behaviour is returned to following a perturbation, and correlates strongly with how much population abundance changes following a disturbance.

Citing Articles

Emerging themes in Population Consequences of Disturbance models.

Keen K, Beltran R, Pirotta E, Costa D Proc Biol Sci. 2021; 288(1957):20210325.

PMID: 34428966 PMC: 8385386. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.0325.


Understanding the population consequences of disturbance.

Pirotta E, Booth C, Costa D, Fleishman E, Kraus S, Lusseau D Ecol Evol. 2018; 8(19):9934-9946.

PMID: 30386587 PMC: 6202709. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4458.


Resilience and regime shifts in a marine biodiversity hotspot.

Vasilakopoulos P, Raitsos D, Tzanatos E, Maravelias C Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):13647.

PMID: 29057946 PMC: 5651905. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13852-9.


Temporally and spatially partitioned behaviours of spinner dolphins: implications for resilience to human disturbance.

Tyne J, Johnston D, Christiansen F, Bejder L R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(1):160626.

PMID: 28280561 PMC: 5319327. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160626.

References
1.
Gaillard J, Festa-Bianchet M, Delorme D, Jorgenson J . Body mass and individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1442):471-7. PMC: 1690550. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1024. View

2.
Buckley F, OSullivan K, Mee J, Evans R, Dillon P . Relationships among milk yield, body condition, cow weight, and reproduction in spring-calved Holstein-Friesians. J Dairy Sci. 2003; 86(7):2308-19. DOI: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73823-5. View

3.
Laurance W, Peletier-Jellema A, Geenen B, Koster H, Verweij P, Van Dijck P . Reducing the global environmental impacts of rapid infrastructure expansion. Curr Biol. 2015; 25(7):R259-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2015.02.050. View

4.
Blums P, Nichols J, Hines J, Lindberg M, Mednis A . Individual quality, survival variation and patterns of phenotypic selection on body condition and timing of nesting in birds. Oecologia. 2005; 143(3):365-76. DOI: 10.1007/s00442-004-1794-x. View

5.
Schick R, New L, Thomas L, Costa D, Hindell M, McMahon C . Estimating resource acquisition and at-sea body condition of a marine predator. J Anim Ecol. 2013; 82(6):1300-15. PMC: 4028992. DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12102. View