» Articles » PMID: 27142988

Markers for the Progression of IgA Nephropathy

Overview
Journal J Nephrol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2016 May 5
PMID 27142988
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We have summarized the latest findings on markers for progression of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy (IgAN), the most common primary glomerulonephritis with a high prevalence among end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. The clinical predictors of renal outcome in IgAN nephropathy, such as proteinuria, hypertension, and decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at the time of the diagnosis, are well known. The Oxford classification of IgAN identified four types of histological lesions (known as the MEST score) associated with the development of ESRD and/or a 50 % reduction in eGFR. In addition, the role of genetic risk factors associated with IgAN is being elucidated by genome-wide association studies, with multiple risk alleles described. Recently, biomarkers in serum (galactose-deficient IgA1, IgA/IgG autoantibodies against galactose-deficient IgA1, and soluble CD 89-IgA complexes) and urine (soluble transferrin receptor, interleukin-6/epidermal growth factor ratio, fractalkine, laminin G-like 3 peptide, κ light chains, and mannan-binding lectin) have been identified. Some of these biomarkers may represent candidates for the development of noninvasive diagnostic tests, that would be useful for detection of subclinical disease activity, monitoring disease progression, assessment of treatment, and at the same time circumventing the complications associated with renal biopsies. These advances, along with future disease-specific therapy, will be helpful in improving the treatment effectiveness, prognosis, and the quality of life in connection with IgAN.

Citing Articles

The ratio of high aspartate aminotransferase to alanine aminotransferase: an independent risk factor associated with poor prognosis in IgA nephropathy.

Wei H, Liao B, Zhou Q, Zhou X, Zhong Y, Hao Y Clin Exp Nephrol. 2024; 28(11):1111-1120.

PMID: 38767689 DOI: 10.1007/s10157-024-02513-7.


Clinical significance of urinary inflammatory biomarkers in patients with IgA nephropathy.

Yoon S, Kim J, Jung S, Kim Y, Moon J, Lee S BMC Nephrol. 2024; 25(1):142.

PMID: 38649936 PMC: 11036669. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-024-03574-2.


The Effects of Extracts on IgA Nephropathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adam G, Adam A, Robu S, Harabor V, Harabor A, Nechita A Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2023; 16(7).

PMID: 37513901 PMC: 10385934. DOI: 10.3390/ph16070988.


Urinary N-Acetyl-Beta-D-Glucosaminidase levels predict immunoglobulin a nephropathy remission status.

Liu X, Gong S, Ning Y, Li Y, Zhou H, He L BMC Nephrol. 2023; 24(1):208.

PMID: 37452282 PMC: 10347709. DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03262-7.


Global trends and hotspots in IgA nephropathy: a bibliometric analysis and knowledge map visualization from 2012 to 2023.

Wang J, Wang X, Cai X, Pan D Int Urol Nephrol. 2023; 55(12):3197-3207.

PMID: 37074616 PMC: 10113965. DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03598-x.


References
1.
Barbour S, Reich H . Risk stratification of patients with IgA nephropathy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2012; 59(6):865-73. DOI: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2012.02.326. View

2.
Bellur S, Troyanov S, Cook H, Roberts I . Immunostaining findings in IgA nephropathy: correlation with histology and clinical outcome in the Oxford classification patient cohort. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011; 26(8):2533-6. DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfq812. View

3.
Barbour S, Espino-Hernandez G, Reich H, Coppo R, Roberts I, Feehally J . The MEST score provides earlier risk prediction in lgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2016; 89(1):167-75. DOI: 10.1038/ki.2015.322. View

4.
Szeto C, Li P . MicroRNAs in IgA nephropathy. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2014; 10(5):249-56. DOI: 10.1038/nrneph.2014.50. View

5.
Torres D, Rossini M, Manno C, Mattace-Raso F, DAltri C, Ranieri E . The ratio of epidermal growth factor to monocyte chemotactic peptide-1 in the urine predicts renal prognosis in IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int. 2007; 73(3):327-33. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002621. View