» Articles » PMID: 27135514

Plant Responses to Simultaneous Biotic and Abiotic Stress: Molecular Mechanisms

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2016 May 3
PMID 27135514
Citations 189
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Plants are constantly confronted to both abiotic and biotic stresses that seriously reduce their productivity. Plant responses to these stresses are complex and involve numerous physiological, molecular, and cellular adaptations. Recent evidence shows that a combination of abiotic and biotic stress can have a positive effect on plant performance by reducing the susceptibility to biotic stress. Such an interaction between both types of stress points to a crosstalk between their respective signaling pathways. This crosstalk may be synergistic and/or antagonistic and include among others the involvement of phytohormones, transcription factors, kinase cascades, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). In certain cases, such crosstalk can lead to a cross-tolerance and enhancement of a plant's resistance against pathogens. This review aims at giving an insight into cross-tolerance between abiotic and biotic stress, focusing on the molecular level and regulatory pathways.

Citing Articles

Deciphering nutrient stress in plants: integrative insight from metabolomics and proteomics.

Moshood A, Abdulraheem M, Li L, Zhang Y, Raghavan V, Hu J Funct Integr Genomics. 2025; 25(1):38.

PMID: 39955391 DOI: 10.1007/s10142-025-01551-y.


Arabidopsis Calcium Dependent Protein Kinase 3, and Its Orthologues OsCPK1, OsCPK15, and AcCPK16, Are Involved in Biotic and Abiotic Stresses.

Valmonte-Cortes G, Higgins C, MacDiarmid R Plants (Basel). 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39861648 PMC: 11768100. DOI: 10.3390/plants14020294.


Plant-microbe interactions: PGPM as microbial inoculants/biofertilizers for sustaining crop productivity and soil fertility.

Laishram B, Devi O, Dutta R, Senthilkumar T, Goyal G, Paliwal D Curr Res Microb Sci. 2025; 8():100333.

PMID: 39835267 PMC: 11743900. DOI: 10.1016/j.crmicr.2024.100333.


Overexpression of the Potato Gene Enhances Drought Resistance and Root Development in Transgenic Plants.

Yao P, Cui J, Zhang C, Wei J, Su X, Sun C Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(23).

PMID: 39684460 PMC: 11641466. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252312748.


Genetic Foundation of Leaf Senescence: Insights from Natural and Cultivated Plant Diversity.

Doan P, Vuong H, Kim J Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39683197 PMC: 11644566. DOI: 10.3390/plants13233405.


References
1.
Vinocur B, Altman A . Recent advances in engineering plant tolerance to abiotic stress: achievements and limitations. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005; 16(2):123-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2005.02.001. View

2.
Laloi C, Apel K, Danon A . Reactive oxygen signalling: the latest news. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004; 7(3):323-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2004.03.005. View

3.
Besser K, Jarosch B, Langen G, Kogel K . Expression analysis of genes induced in barley after chemical activation reveals distinct disease resistance pathways. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010; 1(5):277-86. DOI: 10.1046/j.1364-3703.2000.00031.x. View

4.
Anderson J, Badruzsaufari E, Schenk P, Manners J, Desmond O, Ehlert C . Antagonistic interaction between abscisic acid and jasmonate-ethylene signaling pathways modulates defense gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 2004; 16(12):3460-79. PMC: 535886. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.104.025833. View

5.
Tran L, Nishiyama R, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K . Potential utilization of NAC transcription factors to enhance abiotic stress tolerance in plants by biotechnological approach. GM Crops. 2011; 1(1):32-9. DOI: 10.4161/gmcr.1.1.10569. View